Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

Acute exacerbation (AE) of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a severe complication of lung resection in lung cancer patients with ILD (LC-ILD). This study aimed to assess the predictive value of comorbidities other than ILD for postoperative AE in patients with LC-ILD. We retrospectively evaluated 68 patients with LC-ILD who had undergone lung resection. We classified them into two groups: those who had developed postoperative AE within 30 days after resection and those who had not. We analyzed patient characteristics, high-resolution computed tomography findings, clinical data, pulmonary function, and intraoperative data. The incidence of postoperative AEs was 11.8%. In univariate analysis, performance status (PS), honeycombing, forced vital capacity (FVC), and high hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels without comorbidities were significantly associated with postoperative AE. Patients were divided into two groups according to cutoff levels of those four variables as determined by receiver operating characteristic curves, revealing that the rates of patients without postoperative AE differed significantly between groups. The present results suggested that preoperative comorbidities other than ILD were not risk factors for postoperative AE in patients with LC-ILD. However, a high preoperative HbA1c level, poor PS, low FVC, and honeycombing may be associated with postoperative AE of LC-ILD.

DOI： 10.18926/AMO/65495

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) symptoms are not fully understood in non-hospitalized individuals in Japan, and COVID-19 differentiation by symptoms alone remained challenging. Therefore, this study aimed to examine COVID-19 prediction from symptoms using real-world data in an outpatient fever clinic. METHODS: We compared the symptoms of COVID-19-positive and negative patients who visited the outpatient fever clinic at Imabari City Medical Association General Hospital and tested for COVID-19 from April 2021 to May 2022. This retrospective single-center study enrolled 2,693 consecutive patients. RESULTS: COVID-19-positive patients had a higher frequency of close contact with COVID-19-infected patients compared with COVID-19-negative patients. Moreover, patients with COVID-19 had high-grade fever at the clinic compared with patients without COVID-19. Additionally, the most common symptom in patients with COVID-19 was sore throat (67.3%), followed by cough (62.0%), which was approximately twice as common in patients without COVID-19. COVID-19 was more frequently identified in patients having a fever (≥37.5℃) with a sore throat, a cough, or both. The positive COVID-19 rate reached approximately half (45%) when three symptoms were present. CONCLUSION: These results suggested that COVID-19 prediction by combinations of simple symptoms and close contact with COVID-19-infected patients might be useful and lead to recommendations for testing of COVID-19 in symptomatic individuals.

DOI： 10.7759/cureus.36614

PubMed

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本呼吸器学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本呼吸器学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本呼吸器内視鏡学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

INTRODUCTION: Final overall survival (OS) analyses are presented for EGFR mutations and liver or brain metastases subgroups in the phase III IMpower150 study (NCT02366143) evaluating atezolizumab+bevacizumab+carboplatin/paclitaxel (ABCP) or atezolizumab+carboplatin/paclitaxel (ACP) vs bevacizumab+carboplatin/paclitaxel (BCP). METHODS: Overall, 1202 patients (intention-to-treat [ITT] population) with chemotherapy-naive, metastatic, nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer were randomized to ABCP, ACP or BCP. Patients with treated, stable brain metastases were permitted. OS was assessed in EGFR mutations and baseline liver metastases subgroups; rate and time to development (TTD) of new brain metastases was assessed in ITT patients. RESULTS: At data cutoff (September 13, 2019; median follow-up, 39.3 months), OS improvements were sustained with ABCP versus BCP in sensitizing EGFR mutations (all: hazard ratio [HR] 0.60; 95% CI: 0.31-1.14; prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor [TKI]: HR 0.74; 95% CI: 0.38-1.46) and baseline liver metastases (HR 0.68; 95% CI: 0.45-1.02) subgroups. ACP did not show survival benefit versus BCP in sensitizing EGFR mutations (all: HR 1.0; 95% CI: 0.57-1.74; prior TKI: HR 1.22; 95% CI: 0.68-2.22) or liver metastases (HR 1.01; 95% CI: 0.68-1.51) subgroups. Overall, 100 patients (8.3%) developed new brain metastases. While not formally evaluated, an improvement toward delayed TTD was seen with ABCP vs BCP (HR, 0.68; 95% CI: 0.39-1.19). CONCLUSIONS: This final exploratory analysis showed OS benefits for ABCP versus BCP in patients with sensitizing EGFR mutations, including those with prior TKI failures, and with liver metastases, although these results should be interpreted with caution. The impact of ABCP on delaying the development of new brain lesions requires further investigation.

DOI： 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.09.014

PubMed

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

INTRODUCTION: Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved outcomes over chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in phase 3 international trials. In the phase 1 KEYNOTE-011 study (parts B and C), we evaluated the safety/activity of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Eligible patients received 4 cycles (every 3 weeks) of pembrolizumab 200 mg plus chemotherapy (cisplatin 75 mg/m2/carboplatin area under the curve [AUC] 5 mg/mL/min and pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 in part B [nonsquamous]; carboplatin AUC 6 mg/mL/min and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2/nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 (weekly) in part C [squamous]), followed by maintenance pembrolizumab (and pemetrexed, part B). The primary endpoint was incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during the first 3 weeks of treatment. Overall response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1 by central review) was exploratory. RESULTS: In part B (median follow-up, 16.0 months; n = 12) 1 DLT occurred (grade 4 hyponatremia). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 9 patients (75%). Two patients had grade 5 treatment-related AEs (pneumonitis and interstitial lung disease). In part C (median follow-up, 9.9 months; n = 14), 2 DLTs occurred (both grade 3 febrile neutropenia). Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs occurred in 11 patients (79%); none were fatal. ORR was 73% in part B and 50% in part C, irrespective of PD-L1 status. CONCLUSION: Safety results show first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy is feasible in Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC. Antitumor activity was observed irrespective of PD-L1 status and was comparable to that in international studies. TRIAL REGISTER: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01840579.

DOI： 10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100458

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

BACKGROUND: In a phase I study, afatinib (30 mg/body daily) plus bevacizumab (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks) was well tolerated and showed favourable outcomes in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Herein, we report the 2-year progression-free survival, overall survival and safety profile of these patients. METHODS: Chemo-naïve patients with EGFR-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer were enrolled. One group of patients received 40 mg afatinib daily and 15 mg/kg bevacizumab every 3 weeks (level 0) until disease progression or severe toxicity. Another group of patients received 30 mg afatinib daily and the same dose of bevacizumab (level 1). Dose-limiting toxicity was the primary endpoint, whereas long-term progression-free survival, overall survival and tolerability were secondary endpoints. Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The study included 19 patients (level 0: 5; level - 1: 14). Until the data cut-off date, seven patients continued the treatment, whereas 12 discontinued due to disease progression (n = 5) or toxicity (n = 7). The median PFS was 24.2 months, while the median overall survival was not reached. All patients developed adverse effects. Diarrhoea and skin rash were frequently observed as severe adverse events (grade 3). A secondary EGFR mutation (T790M) was detected in two patients after progression. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged follow-up revealed that combination therapy with afatinib and bevacizumab might improve survival outcomes in EGFR-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients and seems to be promising. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000015944.

DOI： 10.1093/jjco/hyab084

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

Pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed-platinum significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with manageable safety compared with placebo plus pemetrexed-platinum in patients with previously untreated metastatic nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without EGFR/ALK alterations in the global, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 KEYNOTE-189 study. We present results of Japanese patients enrolled in the KEYNOTE-189 global and Japan extension studies. Patients were randomized 2:1 to intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks (Q3W) for up to 35 cycles. All patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 plus the investigator's choice of cisplatin or carboplatin Q3W for four cycles, followed by maintenance pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 Q3W (all intravenous). Co-primary endpoints were OS and PFS. Forty Japanese patients enrolled (pembrolizumab, n = 25; placebo, n = 15). At data cutoff (20 May 2019; median time from randomization to data cutoff, 18.5 [range, 14.7-38.2] months), the median OS was not reached in the pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed-platinum arm; the median OS was 25.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.9-29.0) months in the placebo plus pemetrexed-platinum arm (hazard ratio [HR] .29; 95% CI, .07-1.15). The median (95% CI) PFS was 16.5 (8.8-21.1) compared with 7.1 (4.7-21.4) months (HR, .62; 95% CI, .27-1.42), respectively. There were no grade 5 adverse events (AE). Grade 3/4 AE occurred in 72% vs 60% of patients in the pembrolizumab vs placebo arms; 40% vs 20% had immune-mediated AE, and 4% vs 0% had infusion reactions. Efficacy and safety outcomes were similar to those from the global study and support first-line therapy with pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed-platinum in Japanese patients with nonsquamous NSCLC without EGFR/ALK alterations.

DOI： 10.1111/cas.14980

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

INTRODUCTION: We report the final overall survival (OS) analyses of atezolizumab-carboplatin-paclitaxel (ACP [experimental arm]) and OS data with approximately 39.8 months of median follow-up with atezolizumab-bevacizumab-carboplatin-paclitaxel (ABCP) versus bevacizumab-carboplatin-paclitaxel (BCP) in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC in the phase 3 IMpower150 study (NCT02366143). METHODS: In this randomized, open-label study (N = 1202), coprimary end points included investigator-assessed progression-free survival and OS in intention-to-treat (ITT) wild-type (WT; no EGFR or ALK alterations) patients. Secondary and exploratory end points included OS in ITT and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) subgroups defined by the VENTANA SP142 and SP263 immunohistochemistry assays. RESULTS: At the final analysis with ACP versus BCP (data cutoff: September 13, 2019; minimum follow-up: 32.4 mo), ACP had numerical, but not statistically significant, improvements in OS (ITT-WT: median OS = 19.0 versus 14.7 mo; hazard ratio = 0.84; 95% confidence interval: 0.71-1.00). OS benefit was sustained with ABCP versus BCP (ITT-WT: 19.5 versus 14.7 mo; hazard ratio = 0.80; 95% confidence interval: 0.67-0.95). Exploratory analyses in the SP142-defined PD-L1 subgroups revealed longer median OS with ABCP and ACP versus BCP in PD-L1-high and PD-L1-positive subgroups; in the PD-L1-negative subgroups, median OS was similar with ACP and ABCP versus BCP. Safety was consistent with that in earlier analyses (data cutoff: January 22, 2018). CONCLUSIONS: At the final IMpower150 OS analysis, ACP had numerical, but not statistically significant, OS improvement versus BCP. Updated data with an additional 20 months of follow-up revealed continued OS improvement with ABCP versus BCP in all patients.

DOI： 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.07.009

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

OBJECTIVES: The LURET phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the multikinase inhibitor vandetanib in patients with previously treatedRET-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Among the eligible patients included in the primary analysis, the objective response rate met the primary endpoint (53 %, 90 % confidence interval [CI]: 31-74). Here, we report final survival outcomes of the LURET study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients with previously treated RET-rearranged advanced NSCLC continuously received 300 mg of oral vandetanib daily. This final analysis provides updated data on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. This study was registered with UMIN-CTR (number UMIN 000010095). RESULTS: Among the 19 patients in the intention-to-treat population, 42 % had been heavily treated with 3 or more prior chemotherapy regimens. The median PFS was 6.5 months (95 % CI, 3.9-9.3) as determined by an independent radiology review committee. The median OS was 13.5 months (95 % CI, 9.8-28.1) and the overall survival rate at 12 months was 52.6 % (95 % CI 28.7-71.9). The most common adverse events were hypertension (84.2 %), diarrhea (78.9 %), and rash acneiform (63.2 %). Overall, 11 patients (57.9 %) had adverse events leading to a dose reduction, although the safety profile was consistent with that reported in previous studies. CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that vandetanib enabled a prolonged and clinically meaningful PFS and OS in patients with previously treatedRET-rearranged advanced NSCLC at the updated final analysis. The safety profile was consistent with that reported in previous studies, although most of the patients experienced off-target adverse events besides RET.

DOI： 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.03.002

PubMed

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

A 38-year-old man was admitted to our hospital because of right chest pain and high fever. Chest X-ray and computed tomography scan revealed right pleural effusion and pleural thickness. Diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma was established by pleural biopsy. Serum level of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was high. We performed extrapleural pneumonectomy which improved high fever and inflammation, however the patient died three months after surgery.

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

Introduction In preclinical data, the combination therapy with S-1 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) had a synergistic antitumor effect on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), regardless of the EGFR mutation status. Patients and Methods Patients with previously treated NSCLC and adequate organ function regardless of EGFR mutation status were eligible for the phase I study, with wild-type EGFR were eligible for the phase II study. Treatment consisted of erlotinib 150 mg/body orally once every day and S-1 60 mg/m2, 70 mg/m2, or 80 mg/m2 (level 0, level 1, or level 2) orally on days 1-14 every three weeks. The primary endpoint for the phase I study was the determination of the recommended dose (RD), the phase II study was the overall response rate (ORR). Results A total of 7 patients with performance-status (PS) 0 or 1 were enrolled as subjects in phase I. Five of these subjects were EGFR-mutation positive. Four subjects were enrolled at S-1 dose level 1 and 3 were enrolled at S-1 dose level 2. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in these subjects. The RD was decided as erlotinib 150 mg/body and S-1 80 mg/m2. In phase I, 5 subjects achieved partial response, and the ORR was 71.4%. A total of 10 patients with PS 0, 1, or 2 EGFR-wild type NSCLC were enrolled in phase II. In phase II, the ORR was 10.0%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 40.0%. After the enrollment of 10 subjects, enrollment was stopped based on two treatment-related deaths. Conclusion The combination therapy of erlotinib plus S-1 was not feasible in the EGFR wild-type NSCLC at least and early stopped. Trial registration: UMIN-CTR Identifier: 000003421 (2010/03/31, phase I), 000003422 (2010/03/31, Phase II).

DOI： 10.1007/s10637-020-00985-4

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

BACKGROUND: Two phase II studies in Japan examined the efficacy and safety of nivolumab, a programmed cell death 1 receptor inhibitor, in patients with advanced squamous and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (ONO-4538-05 and ONO-4538-06). We examined the long-term efficacy and safety of nivolumab in these patients treated for up to 5 years. METHODS: Patients with squamous (N = 35) or non-squamous (N = 76) non-small cell lung cancer received nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks) until disease progression/death. Overall survival and progression-free survival were assessed at 5 years after starting treatment in separate and pooled analyses. Safety was evaluated in terms of treatment-related adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients were alive at the database lock (26 July 2019). The median overall survival (95% confidence interval) and 5-year survival rate were 16.3 (12.4-25.2) months and 14.3% in squamous patients, 17.1 (13.3-23.0) months and 19.4% in non-squamous patients and 17.1 (14.2-20.6) months and 17.8% in the pooled analysis, respectively. Programmed death ligand-1 expression tended to be greater among 5-year survivors than in non-survivors (P = 0.0703). Overall survival prolonged with increasing programmed death ligand-1 expression, with 5-year survival rates of 11.8, 21.8 and 41.7% in patients with programmed death ligand-1 expression of <1, ≥1-<50 and ≥50%, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events in ≥10% of patients (pooled analysis) included rash (15.3%), malaise (14.4%), decreased appetite (14.4%), pyrexia (14.4%) and nausea (10.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival with nivolumab was observed in patients with squamous or non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. No new safety signals were reported after ≥5 years of follow-up.

DOI： 10.1093/jjco/hyaa157

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)   Publisher：Lancet Publishing Group  

Background: First-line durvalumab plus etoposide with either cisplatin or carboplatin (platinum–etoposide) showed a significant improvement in overall survival versus platinum–etoposide alone in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) in the CASPIAN study. Here we report updated results, including the primary analysis for overall survival with durvalumab plus tremelimumab plus platinum–etoposide versus platinum–etoposide alone. Methods: CASPIAN is an ongoing, open-label, sponsor-blind, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial at 209 cancer treatment centres in 23 countries worldwide. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older (20 years in Japan) and had treatment-naive, histologically or cytologically documented ES-SCLC, with a WHO performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) in blocks of six, stratified by planned platinum, using an interactive voice-response or web-response system to receive intravenous durvalumab plus tremelimumab plus platinum–etoposide, durvalumab plus platinum–etoposide, or platinum–etoposide alone. In all groups, patients received etoposide 80–100 mg/m2 on days 1–3 of each cycle with investigator's choice of either carboplatin area under the curve 5–6 mg/mL/min or cisplatin 75–80 mg/m2 on day 1 of each cycle. Patients in the platinum–etoposide group received up to six cycles of platinum–etoposide every 3 weeks and optional prophylactic cranial irradiation (investigator's discretion). Patients in the immunotherapy groups received four cycles of platinum–etoposide plus durvalumab 1500 mg with or without tremelimumab 75 mg every 3 weeks followed by maintenance durvalumab 1500 mg every 4 weeks. The two primary endpoints were overall survival for durvalumab plus platinum–etoposide versus platinum–etoposide and for durvalumab plus tremelimumab plus platinum–etoposide versus platinum–etoposide in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03043872. Findings: Between March 27, 2017, and May 29, 2018, 972 patients were screened and 805 were randomly assigned (268 to durvalumab plus tremelimumab plus platinum–etoposide, 268 to durvalumab plus platinum–etoposide, and 269 to platinum–etoposide). As of Jan 27, 2020, the median follow-up was 25·1 months (IQR 22·3–27·9). Durvalumab plus tremelimumab plus platinum–etoposide was not associated with a significant improvement in overall survival versus platinum–etoposide (hazard ratio [HR] 0·82 [95% CI 0·68–1·00]
p=0·045)
median overall survival was 10·4 months (95% CI 9·6–12·0) versus 10·5 months (9·3–11·2). Durvalumab plus platinum–etoposide showed sustained improvement in overall survival versus platinum–etoposide (HR 0·75 [95% CI 0·62–0·91]
nominal p=0·0032)
median overall survival was 12·9 months (95% CI 11·3–14·7) versus 10·5 months (9·3–11·2). The most common any-cause grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia (85 [32%] of 266 patients in the durvalumab plus tremelimumab plus platinum–etoposide group, 64 [24%] of 265 patients in the durvalumab plus platinum–etoposide group, and 88 [33%] of 266 patients in the platinum–etoposide group) and anaemia (34 [13%], 24 [9%], and 48 [18%]). Any-cause serious adverse events were reported in 121 (45%) patients in the durvalumab plus tremelimumab plus platinum–etoposide group, 85 (32%) in the durvalumab plus platinum–etoposide group, and 97 (36%) in the platinum–etoposide group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in 12 (5%) patients in the durvalumab plus tremelimumab plus platinum–etoposide group (death, febrile neutropenia, and pulmonary embolism [n=2 each]
enterocolitis, general physical health deterioration and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, pneumonia, pneumonitis and hepatitis, respiratory failure, and sudden death [n=1 each]), six (2%) patients in the durvalumab plus platinum–etoposide group (cardiac arrest, dehydration, hepatotoxicity, interstitial lung disease, pancytopenia, and sepsis [n=1 each]), and two (1%) in the platinum–etoposide group (pancytopenia and thrombocytopenia [n=1 each]). Interpretation: First-line durvalumab plus platinum–etoposide showed sustained overall survival improvement versus platinum–etoposide but the addition of tremelimumab to durvalumab plus platinum–etoposide did not significantly improve outcomes versus platinum–etoposide. These results support the use of durvalumab plus platinum–etoposide as a new standard of care for the first-line treatment of ES-SCLC. Funding: AstraZeneca.

DOI： 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30539-8

Scopus

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

BACKGROUND: EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) induce cytolysis and release of tumour proteins, which can stimulate antigen-specific T cells. The safety and efficacy of durvalumab and gefitinib in combination for TKI-naive patients with advanced EGFRm NSCLC was evaluated. METHODS: This Phase 1 open-label, multicentre trial (NCT02088112) was conducted in 56 patients with NSCLC. Dose expansion permitted TKI-naive patients, primarily with activating L858R or Ex19del EGFRm. Arms 1 + 1a received concurrent therapy; Arm 2 received 4 weeks of gefitinib induction followed by concurrent therapy. RESULTS: From dose escalation, the recommended dose of durvalumab was 10 mg/kg Q2W with 250 mg QD gefitinib. Pharmacokinetics were as expected, consistent with inhibition of soluble PD-L1 and no treatment-emergent immunogenicity. In dose expansion, 35% of patients had elevated liver enzymes leading to drug discontinuation. In Arms 1 + 1a, objective response rate was 63.3% (95% CI: 43.9-80.1), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.1 months (95% CI: 5.5-15.2) and median response duration was 9.2 months (95% CI: 3.7-14.0). CONCLUSIONS: Durvalumab and gefitinib in combination had higher toxicity than either agent alone. No significant increase in PFS was detected compared with historical controls. Therefore, concurrent PD-L1 inhibitors with gefitinib should be generally avoided in TKI-naive patients with EGFRm NSCLC.

DOI： 10.1038/s41416-020-01099-7

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

BACKGROUND: Of patients receiving moderate emetic risk chemotherapy (MEC), 30-90% experience chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV); however, the optimal antiemetic treatment remains controversial. METHODS: In this multicenter, prospective, observational study of adults treated with MEC while receiving chemotherapy for various cancer types in Japan, the enrolled patients kept diaries documenting CINV. All participants received a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone. RESULTS: Of the 400 patients enrolled from May 2013 to January 2015, 386 were eligible for evaluation. The median age was 64 (range, 26-84). The overall complete response (CR; no emetic events and no antiemetic measures) rate was 64%. The proportion of patients showing CR was low in the carboplatin (CBDCA)- and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy groups, especially among women. We showed that the CR rates in men were high in the CBDCA (AUC5) + etoposide (ETP) (80%), capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) (78%), and CBDCA+ paclitaxel (PTX) groups for lung cancer (73%). Total control (TC; no emetic events, no antiemetic measures, and no nausea) and complete control (CC; no emetic events, no antiemetic measures, and less than mild nausea) were achieved in 51 and 61% of patients, respectively. Logistic regression analysis revealed history of motion sickness, history of pregnancy-associated vomiting and CBDCA-based chemotherapy as risk factors for CR and history of motion sickness and history of pregnancy-associated vomiting as risk factors for TC. Additional, Ages ≥65 years is an independent predictive factor for achieving TC. CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed that two antiemetics were insufficient to control CINV in patients receiving CBDCA- or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. However, two antiemetics may be sufficiently effective for elderly male patients receiving CBDCA (AUC5) + ETP, CBDCA+PTX for lung cancer, or CAPOX. Additionally, we consider that three antiemetics are necessary for women with colorectal cancer receiving CAPOX. Risk factor analysis related to CR showed that CINV prophylaxis in patients treated with CBDCA-based chemotherapy was generally supportive of the guideline-recommended three antiemetics. However, the control of nausea in patients receiving non-CBDCA-based chemotherapy is a key point to note. The further individualization of antiemetic regimens for patients receiving MEC based on both types of chemotherapy regimens and sex is needed.

DOI： 10.1186/s40360-020-00445-y

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

Lorlatinib is a potent, brain-penetrant, third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)/ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that is active against most known resistance mutations. This is an ongoing phase 1/2, multinational study (NCT01970865) investigating the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of lorlatinib in ALK-rearranged/ROS1-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with or without intracranial (IC) metastases. Because patterns of ALK TKI use in Japan differ from other regions, we present a subgroup analysis of Japanese patients. Patients were enrolled into six expansion (EXP) cohorts based on ALK/ROS1 mutation status and treatment history. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) and the IC-ORR based on independent central review. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetic evaluations. At data cutoff, 39 ALK-rearranged/ROS1-rearranged Japanese patients were enrolled across the six expansion cohorts; all received lorlatinib 100 mg once daily. Thirty-one ALK-rearranged patients previously treated with ≥1 ALK TKI (EXP2 to EXP5) were evaluable for ORR and 15 were evaluable for IC-ORR. The ORR and the IC-ORR for Japanese patients in EXP2-5 were 54.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 36.0-72.7) and 46.7% (95% CI: 21.3-73.4), respectively. Among patients who had received prior alectinib only (EXP3B), the ORR was 42.9%; 95% CI: 9.9-81.6). The most common treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) was hypercholesterolemia (79.5%). Hypertriglyceridemia was the most common grade 3/4 TRAE (25.6%). Single-dose and multiple-dose pharmacokinetic profiles among Japanese patients were similar to those in non-Japanese patients. Lorlatinib showed clinically meaningful responses and IC responses among ALK-rearranged Japanese patients with NSCLC who received ≥1 prior ALK TKI, including meaningful responses among those receiving prior alectinib only. Lorlatinib was generally well tolerated.

DOI： 10.1111/cas.14576

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

The effect of nivolumab and the relation between bone response and tumor control in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with bone metastases are not clear. The outcome of nivolumab monotherapy was investigated, and whether the response of bone metastases is useful as an early predictor of tumor control in patients with NSCLC with bone metastases was examined. The participants included 15 patients who received nivolumab monotherapy for NSCLC with bone metastases in our institution between 2015 and 2017. Tumor control was defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST1.1). Response of bone metastases was assessed by the MD Anderson response criteria (MDA criteria). Responses according to RECIST1.1 and the MDA criteria were classified as responder (complete response or partial response) and non-responder [progressive disease (PD) or stable disease]. Progression-free survival (PFS) was investigated using the Kaplan-Meier method. With RECIST1.1, the overall response rate was 20%. Multivariate analysis showed that the MDA criteria were the only risk factor for patients with PD (RECIST1.1). Median PFS was 1.9 months, with PFS of 20% at 6 months. Univariate analysis showed that being a non-responder according to the MDA criteria was the only risk factor for PFS. In patients who were responders (MDA criteria) within 3 months, PFS was 83 and 50% at 3 and 6 months, respectively, though all non-responder (MDA criteria) patients converted to PD (RECIST1.1) within 3 months. Response according to RECIST1.1 was significantly correlated with response according to the MDA criteria (P<0.05). In patients who were both responders according to RECIST1.1 and the MDA criteria, time to response with the MDA criteria (1.4-2.0 months) was earlier than with RECIST1.1 (2.8-3.0 months) in all patients. In conclusion, application of the MDA criteria within 2 months of nivolumab monotherapy is useful for early prediction of response and prognosis in patients with NSCLC with bone metastases.

DOI： 10.3892/ol.2020.11856

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

PURPOSE: Atezolizumab, bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (ABCP) demonstrated survival benefit versus bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (BCP) in chemotherapy-naïve nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We present safety and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to provide additional information on the relative impact of adding atezolizumab to chemotherapy with and without bevacizumab in nonsquamous NSCLC. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive atezolizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (ACP), ABCP, or BCP. Coprimary end points were overall survival and investigator-assessed progression-free survival. The incidence, nature, and severity of adverse events (AEs) were assessed. PROs, a secondary end point, were evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-Core 30 and EORTC QLQ-Lung Cancer 13. RESULTS: Overall, 400 (ACP), 393 (ABCP), and 394 (BCP) patients were safety evaluable (ie, intention-to-treat population that received one or more doses of any study treatment). More patients had grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs during the induction versus maintenance phase (ACP, 40.5% v 8.2%; ABCP, 48.6% v 21.2%; BCP, 44.7% v 11.1%). During induction, the incidence of serious AEs (SAEs) was 28.3%, 28.5%, and 26.4% in the ACP, ABCP, and BCP arms, respectively. During maintenance, SAE incidences were 20.0%, 26.3%, and 13.0%, respectively. Completion rates of the PRO questionnaires were > 88% at baseline and remained ≥ 70% throughout most study visits. Across arms, patients on average reported no clinically meaningful worsening of global health status or physical functioning scores through cycle 13. Patients across arms rated common symptoms with chemotherapy and immunotherapy similarly. CONCLUSION: ABCP seems tolerable and manageable versus ACP and BCP in first-line nonsquamous NSCLC. Treatment tolerability differed between induction and maintenance phases across treatment arms. PROs reflect a minimal treatment burden (eg, health-related quality of life, symptoms) with each regimen.

DOI： 10.1200/JCO.19.03158

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

OBJECTIVES: This phase I/II study assessed the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with carboplatin (CBDCA) and nab-paclitaxel (nab-PTX) in advanced elderly patients (aged ≥75 years) with advanced squamous cell lung cancer (SqCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this phase I study, the doses of carboplatin at an area under the curve (AUC) of 5 or 6 mg/mL/min on day 1 (levels 1 and 2, respectively) were administered along with weekly nab-PTX (100 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks for up to 6 cycles using a modified 3 + 3 design. The primary endpoint for the phase II study was the 6-month progression-free survival (6 m PFS) rate. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients were enrolled in this study. Ten patients were enrolled in the phase I part. At dose level 1, 2/7 patients showed dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of grade 3 diarrhea and febrile neutropenia; at dose level 2, 1/3 patient exhibited grade 3 anorexia as a DLT. The recommended dose was determined to be level 2. Efficacy was then evaluated in 39 patients enrolled in a phase II study. The median number of cycles was 4 (range, 1-6), and the median follow-up time was 17.5 months (range, 5.6-28.9 months). The 6 m PFS rate was 59.4% (90% confidence interval [CI], 44.8%-71.4%), and the primary endpoint was met. The median overall survival time was 23.5 months (95% CI, 11.6-35.4), and the median PFS was 6.8 months (95% CI, 5.4-9.1). The response rate was 54%, and the disease control rate was 92%. Sixteen patients (41%) received immune checkpoint inhibitors post-study. Common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia (61.5%), anemia (46.2%), thrombocytopenia (17.9%), and febrile neutropenia (15.4%). CONCLUSION: Combination chemotherapy consisting of CBDCA with weekly nab-PTX had a promising efficacy and acceptable toxicities in elderly patients (aged ≥75 years) with advanced SqCLC.

DOI： 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.05.005

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

Background: The effectiveness of bevacizumab monotherapy in elderly patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear. The efficacy of the combinations for elderly patients was explored. Methods: Untreated patients (≥75 years; performance status 0-1) with stage IIIB, IV, or recurrent non-squamous NSCLC were included. Patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements were eligible even if they received tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive docetaxel (50 mg/m2) (DB) or pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) (PB) with bevacizumab (15 m/kg). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Treatment was administered every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: Overall, 103 patients (DB: n=51; PB: n=52) were enrolled. In the DB and PB arms, median ages [range] were 78 [75-88] and 79 [75-94] years, respectively; median PFS were 6.1 and 4.6 months, respectively [hazard ratio (HR), 1.03; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.66-1.61]; and response rates were 43%, and 40%, respectively (P=0.840). Grade ≥3 leukopenia, neutropenia, and fatigue incidences were significantly higher in the DB arm. Febrile neutropenia incidence did not differ significantly (16% vs. 12%, P=0.578). One patient in the PB arm died from a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Quality of life (QoL) analysis revealed less deterioration in the PB arm. Conclusions: In previously untreated elderly patients with non-squamous NSCLC, PB shows feasibility, better QoL, and promising efficacy in terms of PFS, and an objective response rate for further analysis (UMIN000012786).

DOI： 10.21037/tlcr.2020.03.29

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

In a subgroup of Japanese patients in the ARCHER 1050 randomized phase 3 trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety and determined the effects of dose modifications on adverse events (AE) and therapy management of first-line oral dacomitinib 45 mg compared with oral gefitinib 250 mg, each once daily in 28-d cycles, in patients with EGFR-activating mutation-positive (EGFR-positive; exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R substitution mutations) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS; RECIST, version 1.1, by blinded independent review). In 81 Japanese patients (40 dacomitinib, 41 gefitinib), PFS was longer with dacomitinib compared with gefitinib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.544 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.307-0.961]; 2-sided P = .0327; median 18.2 for dacomitinib [95% CI, 11.0-31.3] mo, 9.3 [95% CI, 7.4-14.7] mo for gefitinib). The most common Grade 3 AEs were dermatitis acneiform with dacomitinib (27.5%) and increased alanine aminotransferase with gefitinib (12.2%). A higher proportion of patients receiving dacomitinib (85.0%) compared with gefitinib (24.4%) had AEs leading to dose reduction. Incidence and severity of diarrhea, dermatitis acneiform, stomatitis and paronychia were generally reduced after dacomitinib dose reductions and dacomitinib treatment duration was generally longer in patients with a dose reduction in comparison with those without a dose reduction. Our results confirmed the efficacy and safety of first-line dacomitinib in Japanese patients with EGFR-positive advanced NSCLC.

DOI： 10.1111/cas.14384

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

Papulopustular rash, an acneiform rash, appears on the seborrheic region during the first to second week of treatment with an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (EGFRi). The rash gradually disappears after the fourth week; however, it persists or newly develops in other regions during EGFRi treatment. Because Staphylococcus aureus is frequently isolated from late-phase papulopustular rash, we assessed the incidence of bacterial infection and treatment outcomes of patients with late-phase papulopustular rash. Sixty-four cases treated with an EGFRi over 4 weeks who presented with papulopustular rash were assessed retrospectively. The median duration of EGFR inhibitor treatment was 5 months. Grade 2 and 3 papulopustular rash was observed in 47 and eight cases, respectively. Bacterial culture was performed in 51 cases, 50 of which yielded positive results: methicillin-sensitive S. aureus in 29, methicillin-resistant S. aureus in 14, Staphylococcus species in five, Pseudomonas aeruginosa in three, and other in four cases. Of the S. aureus isolates, 42% were resistant to minocycline and 40% to levofloxacin. After treatment with topical and/or oral antibiotics without topical corticosteroids, the papulopustular rash rapidly improved by an average of 2.9 ± 3.4 weeks. However, use of a combination of antibiotics and a topical corticosteroid prolonged the recovery period to an average of 18.9 ± 11.4 weeks. In conclusion, folliculitis that develops over 4 weeks after the initiation of EGFRi treatment is typically caused by staphylococcal infection. Bacterial culture is necessary due to the high rate of antibiotic resistance. It is important to distinguish late- from early-phase papulopustular rash and to treat using different approaches.

DOI： 10.1111/1346-8138.15170

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

PURPOSE: To assess the utility of the cobas EGFR Mutation Test, with tissue and plasma, for first-line osimertinib therapy for patients with EGFR-mutated (EGFRm; Ex19del and/or L858R) advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from the FLAURA study (NCT02296125). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Tumor tissue EGFRm status was determined at screening using the central cobas tissue test or a local tissue test. Baseline circulating tumor (ct)DNA EGFRm status was retrospectively determined with the central cobas plasma test. RESULTS: Of 994 patients screened, 556 were randomized (289 and 267 with central and local EGFR test results, respectively) and 438 failed screening. Of those randomized from local EGFR test results, 217 patients had available central test results; 211/217 (97%) were retrospectively confirmed EGFRm positive by central cobas tissue test. Using reference central cobas tissue test results, positive percent agreements with cobas plasma test results for Ex19del and L858R detection were 79% [95% confidence interval (CI), 74-84] and 68% (95% CI, 61-75), respectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) superiority with osimertinib over comparator EGFR-TKI remained consistent irrespective of randomization route (central/local EGFRm-positive tissue test). In both treatment arms, PFS was prolonged in plasma ctDNA EGFRm-negative (23.5 and 15.0 months) versus -positive patients (15.2 and 9.7 months). CONCLUSIONS: Our results support utility of cobas tissue and plasma testing to aid selection of patients with EGFRm advanced NSCLC for first-line osimertinib treatment. Lack of EGFRm detection in plasma was associated with prolonged PFS versus patients plasma EGFRm positive, potentially due to patients having lower tumor burden.

DOI： 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-1126

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

Skeletal-related events (SREs) may occur at the time of first diagnosis in 20-30% of lung cancer patients with bone metastases. Several clinical trials have shown that zoledronic acid (ZA) is effective for decreasing SREs. The main objective of the present study was to discuss clinical data of ZA and compare the frequency of SREs with previous reports. All patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with metastatic bone disease who were administered ZA at least twice between January 2008 and December 2009 were eligible for inclusion in the study. In total, 198 consecutive patients were identified. The median duration of ZA administration was 106 days [95% confidence interval (CI), 92-133 days], and the median number of ZA administrations was 4 (range, 2-41). The median time to first SRE in patients who experienced SRE following ZA treatment was 202 days (95% CI, 156-264 days). Among the 78 patients who had already experienced SRE prior to ZA treatment, 35 (45%) experienced SRE subsequently after starting ZA treatment. On the other hand, among the 120 patients without a history of SRE before starting ZA treatment, 42 (35%) experienced SRE after the start of ZA administration (P=0.16). No osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) was reported in any of the patients. The present study revealed that ZA had a certain level of efficacy regardless of the presence or absence of prior SREs. However, the duration of ZA therapy was short in this study; further accumulation of data on the long-term prognosis and incidence rates of ONJ and other late complications of ZA therapy seems to be particularly important.

DOI： 10.3892/mco.2019.1903

PubMed

researchmap

Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)   Publisher：Elsevier BV  

DOI： 10.1093/annonc/mdz338.105

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab is a programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) receptor inhibitor antibody that enhances immune system antitumor activity. It is associated with longer overall survival (OS) than the standard treatment of docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced squamous (SQ) and non-squamous (non-SQ) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We previously conducted two phase II studies of nivolumab in Japanese patients with SQ (ONO-4538-05) and non-SQ (ONO-4538-06) NSCLC, showing overall response rates (ORRs) (95% CI) of 25.7% (14.2-42.1) and 22.4% (14.5-32.9), respectively, with acceptable toxicity. In this analysis, we more precisely estimated the long-term safety and efficacy in patients with SQ and non-SQ NSCLC by pooling data from these two trials. METHODS: SQ (N = 35) and non-SQ (N = 76) NSCLC patients received nivolumab (3 mg/kg, every 2 weeks) until progression or discontinuation. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A pooled analysis of SQ and non-SQ patients was also performed. RESULTS: In SQ NSCLC patients, the median OS (95% CI) was 16.3 months (12.4-25.2), and the estimated 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year survival rates were 71.4% (53.4-83.5), 37.1% (21.6-52.7), and 20.0% (8.8-34.4), respectively. In non-SQ NSCLC patients, median OS was 17.1 months (13.3-23.0), and the estimated 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 68.0% (56.2-77.3), 37.4% (26.5-48.1), and 31.9% (21.7-42.5), respectively. When SQ NSCLC and non-SQ NSCLC data were pooled, the median OS was 17.1 months (14.2-20.6), and the estimated 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 69.1% (59.6-76.8), 37.3% (28.3-46.2), and 28.1% (20.0-36.7), respectively. Twenty (76.9%) of 26 responders lived for 3 or more years. Nivolumab was well tolerated and no new safety signals were found. CONCLUSION: Treatment with nivolumab improved long-term survival and was well tolerated in patients with SQ and non-SQ NSCLC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: JapicCTI-132072; JapicCTI-132073.

DOI： 10.1002/cam4.2411

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

BACKGROUND/AIM: For immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-pretreated patients, docetaxel and ramucirumab (DOC+RAM) combination therapy may be more effective compared to patients not receiving ICI treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From June 2013 to July 2018, 39 patients with advanced/recurrent non-small cell lung cancer underwent DOC+RAM therapy. We analyzed the efficacy and safety of DOC+RAM therapy based on the presence (pre-ICI+) or absence (pre-ICI-) of ICI pretreatment history. RESULTS: Of the 39 patients treated with DOC+RAM, we identified 18 (46%) pre-ICI+ patients. Overall response rates for DOC+RAM concerning pre-ICI+ and pre-ICI- patients were 38.9% vs. 19.0%, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.7 vs. 2.3 months [hazard ratio(HR)=0.36; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.16-0.80]. Adverse events such as fever, myalgia, arthritis, pleural effusion, and pneumonitis tended to be increased in pre-ICI+ patients. CONCLUSION: Despite increased toxicity concerns, DOC+RAM therapy in pre-ICI+ patients showed a trend for tumor regression improvement and statistically significant prolongation of PFS.

DOI： 10.21873/anticanres.13688

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

Therapeutic approaches to bronchopleural fistula (BPF) closure after lung resection are surgical or endoscopic interventions. We evaluated therapeutic outcomes to determine the optimal approach. We reviewed 15 patients who had developed BPF after lung resection for thoracic malignant diseases at our institution in the 10 years since 2008. The patients were 11 men and 4 women (mean age 68 years). We performed one pneumonectomy, 6 lobectomies, 7 segmentectomies, and one partial resection for malignant diseases. The median interval from lung resection to the BPF diagnosis was 46 days. The BPF-associated mortality rate was 26.7% (4/15). The rate of successful BPF closure was 66.6% (10/15). The endoscopic and surgical intervention success rates were 14.2% (1/7) and 69.2% (9/13), respectively (p<0.01). Of 5 patients who had failed BPF treatments, 4 died, and one transferred out without BPF closure. The therapeutic outcomes were related to preoperative comorbidities, performance status at the BPF diagnosis, time intervals from lung resection to BPF diagnosis, and presence of active pneumonia. The difference between endoscopic and surgical outcomes was nonsignificant, although the surgical intervention success rate was somewhat higher. The selection of endoscopic or surgical intervention for BPF does not significantly affect therapeutic outcomes.

DOI： 10.18926/AMO/56934

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

AIM: We investigated the efficacy, safety and optimal schedule of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel monotherapy as second- or third-line treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer patients without epidermal growth factor receptor mutation and anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangement. METHODS: Patients with pretreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer without epidermal growth factor receptor mutation and anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangement were included. The patients were administered 100 mg/m2 of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 (level 0) or on days 1, 8 and 15 (level -1) every 4 weeks during phase I of the trial. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. The estimated objective response rate was 15% and the threshold was 5% with an α error of 0.05 and β error of 0.2 in phase II. RESULTS: The recommended schedule was determined as level -1 in phase I. The characteristics of the 55 patients enrolled in phase II were as follows: median age = 66 years, male/female = 40/15, second/third line = 34/21 and adenocarcinoma/squamous cell carcinoma/large cell carcinoma/others = 34/17/2/2. Objective response rate was 7.3% (95% confidence interval, 2.0-17.6%). Median progression-free survival was 3.4 months. Treatment-related grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia (36.4%), febrile neutropenia (5.5%) and pulmonary infection (3.6%). Three patients had grade 2 pneumonitis and one treatment-related death occurred due to adult respiratory distress syndrome. CONCLUSION: This study failed to meet predefined primary endpoints for pretreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer without epidermal growth factor receptor mutation and anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangement.

DOI： 10.1111/ajco.13147

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

BACKGROUND: The IMpower150 trial showed significant improvements in progression-free and overall survival with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus carboplatin plus paclitaxel (ABCP) versus the standard-of-care bevacizumab plus carboplatin plus paclitaxel (BCP) in chemotherapy-naive patients with non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. Here, we report the efficacy of ABCP or atezolizumab plus carboplatin plus paclitaxel (ACP) versus BCP in key patient subgroups. METHODS: IMpower150 was a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study done at 240 academic medical centres and community oncology practices across 26 countries worldwide. Patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive ABCP, ACP, or BCP every three weeks. The co-primary endpoints were overall survival and investigator-assessed progression-free survival in intention-to-treat wild-type patients (patients with epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] or anaplastic lymphoma kinase [ALK] genetic alterations were excluded). Efficacy was assessed in key subgroups within the intention-to-treat population, including patients with EGFR mutations (both sensitising and non-sensitising; EGFR-positive) previously treated with one or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors and patients with baseline liver metastases. Overall survival in the intention-to-treat population was included among secondary efficacy endpoints. Exploratory endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving an objective response in the intention-to-treat population, including EGFR-positive patients and patients with baseline liver metastases. Data are reported as per the Jan 22, 2018, data cutoff date, at which the number of coprimary prespecified overall survival events was met in the ABCP versus BCP groups. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02366143, and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between March 31, 2015, and Dec 30, 2016, 1202 patients were enrolled. 400 patients were randomly assigned to ABCP, 402 to ACP, and 400 to BCP. In EGFR-positive patients (124 of 1202), median overall survival was not estimable (NE; 95% CI 17·0-NE) with ABCP (34 of 400) and 18·7 months (95% CI 13·4-NE) with BCP (45 of 400; hazard ratio [HR] 0·61 [95% CI 0·29-1·28]). Improved overall survival with ABCP versus BCP was observed in patients with sensitising EGFR mutations (median overall survival NE [95% CI NE-NE] with ABCP [26 of 400] vs 17·5 months [95% CI 11·7-NE] with BCP [32 of 400]; HR 0·31 [95% CI 0·11-0·83]) and in the intention-to-treat population (19·8 months [17·4-24·2] vs 14·9 months [13·4-17·1]; HR 0·76 [0·63-0·93]). Improved median overall survival with ABCP versus BCP was seen in patients with baseline liver metastases (13·3 months [11·6-NE] with ABCP [52 of 400] vs 9·4 months [7·9-11·7] with BCP [57 of 400]; HR 0·52 [0·33-0·82]). Median overall survival was 21·4 months (95% CI 13·8-NE) with ACP versus 18·7 months (95% CI 13·4-NE) with BCP in EGFR-positive patients (HR 0·93 [95% CI 0·51-1·68]). No overall survival benefit was seen with ACP versus BCP in patients with sensitising EGFR mutations (HR 0·90 [95% CI 0·47-1·74]), in the intention-to-treat population (HR 0·85 [0·71-1·03]), or in patients with baseline liver metastases (HR 0·87 [0·57-1·32]). In the intention-to-treat safety-evaluable population, grade 3-4 treatment-related events occurred in 223 (57%) patients in the ABCP group, in 172 (43%) in the ACP group, and in 191 (49%) in the BCP group; 11 (3%) grade 5 adverse events occurred in the ABCP group, as did four (1%) in the ACP group, and nine (2%) in the BCP group. INTERPRETATION: Improved survival was noted for patients treated with ABCP compared with those given BCP in the intention-to-treat population, and in patients with baseline liver metastases. The overall survival signal in the subgroup of patients with EGFR sensitising mutations warrants further study. FUNDING: F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Genentech.

DOI： 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30084-0

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

Background: The FLAURA study was a multicenter, double-blind, Phase 3 study in which patients with previously untreated epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma were randomized 1:1 to oral osimertinib 80 mg once daily or standard-of-care (gefitinib 250 mg or erlotinib 150 mg, once daily) to compare safety and efficacy. In the overall FLAURA study, significantly better progression-free survival was shown with osimertinib versus standard-of-care. Methods: Selected endpoints, including progression-free survival (primary endpoint), overall survival, objective response rate, duration of response and safety were evaluated for the Japanese subset of the FLAURA study. Results: In Japan, 120 eligible Japanese patients were randomized to osimertinib (65 patients) or gefitinib (55 patients) treatment from December 2014 to June 2017. Median progression-free survival was 19.1 (95% confidence interval, 12.6, 23.5) and 13.8 (95% confidence interval, 8.3, 16.6) months with osimertinib and gefitinib, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.38, 0.99). Median overall survival was not reached in either treatment arm (data were immature). In the osimertinib and gefitinib arms, objective response rate was 75.4% (49/65) and 76.4% (42/55), and median duration of response from onset was 18.4 (95% confidence interval, not calculated) and 9.5 (95% confidence interval, 6.2, 13.9) months, respectively. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two groups. The frequency of Grade ≥3 interstitial lung disease and pneumonitis in the two groups were the same (one patient). Conclusions: As the first-line therapy, osimertinib showed significantly improved efficacy versus gefitinib in the Japanese population of the FLAURA study. No new safety concerns were raised. Clinical trial registration: NCT02296125 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

DOI： 10.1093/jjco/hyy179

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

INTRODUCTION: Here we report efficacy and safety data of an Asian subset of the phase III FLAURA trial (NCT02296125), which compares osimertinib with standard of care (SoC) EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC with tumors harboring exon 19 deletion (Ex19del)/L858R EGFR TKI-sensitizing mutations. METHODS: Eligible Asian patients (enrolled at Asian sites) who were at least 18 years of age (≥20 years in Japan) and had untreated EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC were randomized 1:1 to receive osimertinib (80 mg, orally once daily) or an SoC EGFR TKI (gefitinib, 250 mg, or erlotinib, 150 mg, orally once daily). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). The key secondary end points were overall survival, objective response rate, central nervous system efficacy, and safety. RESULTS: The median PFS was 16.5 versus 11.0 months for the osimertinib and SoC EGFR TKI groups, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.54, 95% confidence interval: 0.41-0.72, p < 0.0001). The overall survival data were immature (24% maturity). The objective response rates were 80% for osimertinib and 75% for an SoC EGFR TKI. The median central nervous system PFS was not calculable for the osimertinib group and was 13.8 months for the SoC EGFR TKI group (hazard ratio = 0.55, 95% confidence interval: 0.25-1.17, p = 0.118). Fewer adverse events of grade 3 or higher (40% versus 48%) and fewer adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation (15% versus 21%) were reported with osimertinib versus with an SoC EGFR TKI, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this Asian population, first-line osimertinib demonstrated a clinically meaningful improvement in PFS over an SoC EGFR TKI, with a safety profile consistent with that for the overall FLAURA study population.

DOI： 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.09.004

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

BACKGROUND: The combination of pemetrexed and carboplatin is commonly used for the treatment of advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), mainly because it is comparatively effective and less toxic than other platinum-doublet therapies. Using the JMII (JACAL) study, we report the efficacy and safety of this treatment followed by pemetrexed maintenance in the elderly population (≥70 years of age). METHODS: The JMII study was a multicenter, post-marketing study that assessed the efficacy and safety of carboplatin (AUC6) and pemetrexed (500 mg/m2, given on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle, 4 cycles) followed by pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) maintenance in advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients (n = 109). Retrospective subgroup analyses were performed in elderly patients aged ≥70. RESULTS: The study includes younger (<70 years, n = 84) and elderly (≥70 years, n = 25) patients who received induction therapy. Median progression-free survival and overall survival from the start of the induction phase were 5.2 (95% CI: 3.5, 8.2) and 16.8 (95% CI: 10.3, NC) months for the elderly patients compared with 5.8 (95% CI: 4.3, 7.4) and 20.5 (95% CI: 16.7, NC) months for the younger patients, respectively. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were more frequent in the elderly patients. Non-hematologic toxicities in the elderly patients were comparable to those in younger patients. Dose reduction was more common in the elderly (44% vs 23%), due to hematologic toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in efficacy (evaluated by progression-free survival) between elderly and younger patients. Although grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were frequently observed in the elderly patients, they were easily managed with dose adjustment.

DOI： 10.1016/j.resinv.2018.09.003

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

INTRODUCTION: Approximately one-half of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develop resistance to first- or second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) due to a secondary T790M mutation. This study investigated the pattern of T790M testing after EGFR TKI treatment in a real-world setting in Japan. METHOD: This prospective observational study enrolled patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced/metastatic NSCLC who reported disease progression during treatment with first- or second-generation EGFR TKIs. Data regarding sampling methods for T790M mutation testing (plasma sample, cytology or tissue biopsy) and the treatment strategies after disease progression were recorded prospectively. RESULTS: A total of 236 patients were included in the study (female, 67.4%; median age, 73.0 years), and 205 patients (86.9%) underwent rebiopsy by any of the three possible methods: plasma sampling in 137 patients (58.1%) and tissue/cytology sampling in 68 patients (28.8%) during the first rebiopsy. Overall, 80.6% of the tissue/cytology samples contained tumor cells, and 40% of these samples were positive for the T790M mutation. T790M mutations were detected in only 19.7% of plasma samples. Of the 199 patients who underwent T790M testing, 61 (30%) tested positive, and 56 (91.8%) subsequently received osimertinib. CONCLUSION: Among the 87% of Japanese patients who underwent rebiopsy after progressing on treatment with a first- or second-generation EGFR TKI, approximately 30% tested positive for the T790M mutation and were eligible to receive osimertinib. Although plasma sampling is non-invasive, this rebiopsy method is less sensitive for T790M detection compared with tissue or cytology sampling (UMIN identifier: UMIN000024928). FUNDING: AstraZeneca Japan.

DOI： 10.1007/s40487-018-0064-8

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

INTRODUCTION: In the phase III JCOG0301 trial, chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with daily low-dose carboplatin showed significant benefits in elderly patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared with radiotherapy (RT) alone. However, the long-term patterns and cumulative incidences of toxicity associated with CRT and RT in elderly patients are not well elucidated. We report long-term survival data and late toxicities after a minimum follow-up of 6.4 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were older than 70 years and had unresectable stage III NSCLC. They were randomly assigned to RT or CRT. Prognosis and adverse events data were collected beyond those in the initial report. Late toxicities were defined as occurring more than 90 days after RT initiation. RESULTS: From September 2003 to May 2010, 200 patients (RT arm, n = 100; CRT arm, n = 100) were enrolled. Consistent with the initial report, the CRT arm had better overall survival than the RT arm (hazard ratio, 0.743; 95% confidence interval, 0.552-0.998; 1-sided P = .0239). The proportion of Grade 3/4 late toxicities were 7.4% (heart 2.1%, lung 5.3%) in the RT arm (n = 94) and 7.5% (esophagus 1.1%, lung 6.5%) in the CRT arm (n = 93). No additional cases of late toxicity (Grade 3/4) and treatment-related death have been seen since the initial report that was published. CONCLUSION: Long-term follow-up confirmed the survival benefits of CRT for elderly patients with locally advanced NSCLC. There was no observed increase in late toxicity with CRT compared with RT alone.

DOI： 10.1016/j.cllc.2018.04.018

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

Purpose We report CNS efficacy of osimertinib versus standard epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer from the phase III FLAURA study. Patients and Methods Patients (N = 556) were randomly assigned to osimertinib or standard EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib or erlotinib); brain scans were not mandated unless clinically indicated. Patients with asymptomatic or stable CNS metastases were included. In patients with symptomatic CNS metastases, neurologic status was required to be stable for ≥ 2 weeks after completion of definitive therapy and corticosteroids. A preplanned subgroup analysis with CNS progression-free survival as primary objective was conducted in patients with measurable and/or nonmeasurable CNS lesions on baseline brain scan by blinded independent central neuroradiologic review. The CNS evaluable-for-response set included patients with ≥ one measurable CNS lesion. Results Of 200 patients with available brain scans at baseline, 128 (osimertinib, n = 61; standard EGFR-TKIs, n = 67) had measurable and/or nonmeasurable CNS lesions, including 41 patients (osimertinib, n = 22; standard EGFR-TKIs, n = 19) with ≥ one measurable CNS lesion. Median CNS progression-free survival in patients with measurable and/or nonmeasurable CNS lesions was not reached with osimertinib (95% CI, 16.5 months to not calculable) and 13.9 months (95% CI, 8.3 months to not calculable) with standard EGFR-TKIs (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.86; P = .014 [nominally statistically significant]). CNS objective response rates were 91% and 68% in patients with ≥ one measurable CNS lesion (odds ratio, 4.6; 95% CI, 0.9 to 34.9; P = .066) and 66% and 43% in patients with measurable and/or nonmeasurable CNS lesions (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.2 to 5.2; P = .011) treated with osimertinib and standard EGFR-TKIs, respectively. Probability of experiencing a CNS progression event was consistently lower with osimertinib versus standard EGFR-TKIs. Conclusion Osimertinib has CNS efficacy in patients with untreated EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer. These results suggest a reduced risk of CNS progression with osimertinib versus standard EGFR-TKIs.

DOI： 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.3118

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

Background Radiotherapy (RT) is an effective treatment for elderly patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, no clinical trials have investigated combination RT with pemetrexed (PEM) in chemotherapy-naive patients ≥71 years old. We conducted a phase I/II study to evaluate the appropriate PEM dose, efficacy, and safety of PEM plus RT in elderly patients. Methods Patients ≥71 years with performance status (PS) scores of 0-2 who had pathologically confirmed stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC received PEM (500 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 28-day cycle, 4 courses) and RT (a single 2 Gy daily fraction on 5 consecutive days weekly from day 1; 60 Gy total). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR); the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). Results Forty-one patients with a median age of 79 years were enrolled; 31 were men. Eighteen patients had squamous cell carcinoma, 27 had stage IIIA disease, and 38 had PS scores 0-1. The ORR was 80.5%, while the median OS and PFS rates were 24.9 and 6.9 months, respectively. Two treatment-related deaths occurred owing to RT-related pneumonitis and severe infection, respectively. Common hematological AEs were leucopenia and neutropenia; common non-hematological AEs were anorexia and constipation. Three patients developed PEM-induced interstitial lung disease; however, most AEs were RT-related. Conclusions Combination PEM and RT shows promising efficacy but relatively severe RT-related toxicities. Therefore, this treatment should be prescribed to elderly patients with caution. Trial registration UMIN 000005036 .

DOI： 10.1007/s10637-018-0587-8

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

BACKGROUND: The cancer-cell-killing property of atezolizumab may be enhanced by the blockade of vascular endothelial growth factor-mediated immunosuppression with bevacizumab. This open-label, phase 3 study evaluated atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had not previously received chemotherapy. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients to receive atezolizumab plus carboplatin plus paclitaxel (ACP), bevacizumab plus carboplatin plus paclitaxel (BCP), or atezolizumab plus BCP (ABCP) every 3 weeks for four or six cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with atezolizumab, bevacizumab, or both. The two primary end points were investigator-assessed progression-free survival both among patients in the intention-to-treat population who had a wild-type genotype (WT population; patients with EGFR or ALK genetic alterations were excluded) and among patients in the WT population who had high expression of an effector T-cell (Teff) gene signature in the tumor (Teff-high WT population) and overall survival in the WT population. The ABCP group was compared with the BCP group before the ACP group was compared with the BCP group. RESULTS: In the WT population, 356 patients were assigned to the ABCP group, and 336 to the BCP group. The median progression-free survival was longer in the ABCP group than in the BCP group (8.3 months vs. 6.8 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52 to 0.74; P<0.001); the corresponding values in the Teff-high WT population were 11.3 months and 6.8 months (hazard ratio, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.38 to 0.68]; P<0.001). Progression-free survival was also longer in the ABCP group than in the BCP group in the entire intention-to-treat population (including those with EGFR or ALK genetic alterations) and among patients with low or negative programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, those with low Teff gene-signature expression, and those with liver metastases. Median overall survival among the patients in the WT population was longer in the ABCP group than in the BCP group (19.2 months vs. 14.7 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.96; P=0.02). The safety profile of ABCP was consistent with previously reported safety risks of the individual medicines. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of atezolizumab to bevacizumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival among patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC, regardless of PD-L1 expression and EGFR or ALK genetic alteration status. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech; IMpower150 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02366143 .).

DOI： 10.1056/NEJMoa1716948

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

Purpose: The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel plus ramucirumab with primary prophylactic pegylated (PEG)-granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) for pretreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Results: Sixty-one pretreated NSCLC patients underwent docetaxel plus ramucirumab. Primary prophylactic PEG-G-CSF was performed in 52 (85%) patients (prophylactic group). No febrile neutropenia (FN) (0%) was confirmed in 52 prophylactic group patients, whereas FN was observed in 3 (33%) of 9 non-prophylactic group patients. Among prophylactic group, median lines of prior therapy was 2 (range, 1-9). Median cycles of docetaxel plus ramucirumab was 3 (range, 1-25) (9 and 3 cases moved to ramucirumab and docetaxel monotherapies, respectively). Response rate and disease control rate were 30.8% and 73.1%, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 4.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0-6.6) months. Median overall survival was 11.4 (95% CI, 8.0-13.9) months. Six (11.5%) patients had grade 3/4 neutropenia. Observed grade 3 (incidence ≥10%) adverse event (AE) was oral mucositis (13.5%). There were no grade 4/5 non-hematological AEs. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of docetaxel plus ramucirumab with PEG-G-CSF in clinical practice. Primary prophylactic PEG-G-CSF could markedly reduce incidence of FN. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of pretreated NSCLC cases who had received docetaxel plus ramucirumab in our departments.

DOI： 10.18632/oncotarget.25578

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

Osimertinib is a potent, irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) selective for EGFR-TKI sensitizing (EGFRm) and T790M resistance mutations. The primary objective of the cytology cohort in the AURA study was to investigate safety and efficacy of osimertinib in pretreated Japanese patients with EGFR T790M mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with screening EGFR T790M mutation status determined from cytology samples. The cytology cohort was included in the Phase I dose expansion component of the AURA study. Patients were enrolled based on a positive result of T790M by using cytology samples, and received osimertinib 80 mg in tablet form once daily until disease progression or until clinical benefit was no longer observed at the discretion of the investigator. Primary endpoint for efficacy was objective response rate (ORR) by investigator assessment. Twenty-eight Japanese patients were enrolled into the cytology cohort. At data cut-off (February 1, 2016), 12 (43%) were on treatment. Investigator-assessed ORR was 75% (95% confidence interval [CI] 55, 89) and median duration of response was 9.7 months (95% CI 3.8, not calculable [NC]). Median progression-free survival was 8.3 months (95% CI 4.2, NC) and disease control rate was 96% (95% CI 82, 100). The most common all-causality adverse events were paronychia (46%), dry skin (46%), diarrhea (36%) and rash (36%). Osimertinib provided clinical benefit with a manageable safety profile in patients with pretreated EGFR T790M mutation-positive NSCLC whose screening EGFR T790M mutation-positive status was determined from cytology samples. (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01802632).

DOI： 10.1111/cas.13511

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

Purpose The AURA study ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01802632) included two cohorts of treatment-naïve patients to examine clinical activity and safety of osimertinib (an epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] -tyrosine kinase inhibitor selective for EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor sensitizing [ EGFRm] and EGFR T790M resistance mutations) as first-line treatment of EGFR-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods Sixty treatment-naïve patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFRm NSCLC received osimertinib 80 or 160 mg once daily (30 patients per cohort). End points included investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety evaluation. Plasma samples were collected at or after patients experienced disease progression, as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), to investigate osimertinib resistance mechanisms. Results At data cutoff (November 1, 2016), median follow-up was 19.1 months. Overall ORR was 67% (95% CI, 47% to 83%) in the 80-mg group, 87% (95% CI, 69% to 96%) in the 160-mg group, and 77% (95% CI, 64% to 87%) across doses. Median PFS time was 22.1 months (95% CI, 13.7 to 30.2 months) in the 80-mg group, 19.3 months (95% CI, 13.7 to 26.0 months) in the 160-mg group, and 20.5 months (95% CI, 15.0 to 26.1 months) across doses. Of 38 patients with postprogression plasma samples, 50% had no detectable circulating tumor DNA. Nine of 19 patients had putative resistance mechanisms, including amplification of MET (n = 1); amplification of EGFR and KRAS (n = 1); MEK1, KRAS, or PIK3CA mutation (n = 1 each); EGFR C797S mutation (n = 2); JAK2 mutation (n = 1); and HER2 exon 20 insertion (n = 1). Acquired EGFR T790M was not detected. Conclusion Osimertinib demonstrated a robust ORR and prolonged PFS in treatment-naïve patients with EGFRm advanced NSCLC. There was no evidence of acquired EGFR T790M mutation in postprogression plasma samples.

DOI： 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.7576

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), an anti-erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (HER2) antibody-drug conjugate, has been shown to significantly improve survival in HER2-positive breast cancer. We report a phase II trial of T-DM1 monotherapy in relapsed NSCLC with documented HER2 positivity (an immunohistochemistry [IHC] score of 3+, both an IHC score of 2+ and fluorescence in situ hybridization positivity, or exon 20 mutation). This study was terminated early because of limited efficacy. The demographic characteristics in the 15 assessable patients were as follows: median age, 67 years; male sex, 47%; performance status of 0 to 1, 80%; HER2 status IHC 3+, 33%; HER status IHC 2+/fluorescence in situ hybridization-positive, 20%; and exon 20 mutation, 47%. The median number of delivered cycles was 3 (range 1-11). One patient achieved a partial response with an objective response rate of 6.7% (90% confidence interval: 0.2-32.0). With a median follow-up time of 9.2 months, the median progression-free survival time and median survival time were 2.0 and 10.9 months, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events included thrombocytopenia (40%) and hepatotoxicity (20%) without any treatment-related deaths. T-DM1 had a limited efficacy for HER2-positive NSCLC in our cohort. Applying the concept of precision medicine to tumors appears challenging; thus, additional molecular approaches are warranted.

DOI： 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.10.032

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

BACKGROUND: Osimertinib is an oral, third-generation, irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that selectively inhibits both EGFR-TKI-sensitizing and EGFR T790M resistance mutations. We compared osimertinib with standard EGFR-TKIs in patients with previously untreated, EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: In this double-blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 556 patients with previously untreated, EGFR mutation-positive (exon 19 deletion or L858R) advanced NSCLC in a 1:1 ratio to receive either osimertinib (at a dose of 80 mg once daily) or a standard EGFR-TKI (gefitinib at a dose of 250 mg once daily or erlotinib at a dose of 150 mg once daily). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. RESULTS: The median progression-free survival was significantly longer with osimertinib than with standard EGFR-TKIs (18.9 months vs. 10.2 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 0.57; P<0.001). The objective response rate was similar in the two groups: 80% with osimertinib and 76% with standard EGFR-TKIs (odds ratio, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.90; P=0.24). The median duration of response was 17.2 months (95% CI, 13.8 to 22.0) with osimertinib versus 8.5 months (95% CI, 7.3 to 9.8) with standard EGFR-TKIs. Data on overall survival were immature at the interim analysis (25% maturity). The survival rate at 18 months was 83% (95% CI, 78 to 87) with osimertinib and 71% (95% CI, 65 to 76) with standard EGFR-TKIs (hazard ratio for death, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.88; P=0.007 [nonsignificant in the interim analysis]). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were less frequent with osimertinib than with standard EGFR-TKIs (34% vs. 45%). CONCLUSIONS: Osimertinib showed efficacy superior to that of standard EGFR-TKIs in the first-line treatment of EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC, with a similar safety profile and lower rates of serious adverse events. (Funded by AstraZeneca; FLAURA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02296125 .).

DOI： 10.1056/NEJMoa1713137

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

OBJECTIVE: In advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), treatment with afatinib, a second-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), confers a significant survival benefit over platinum-based chemotherapy. The first-generation EGFR-TKIs gefitinib and erlotinib in combination with bevacizumab have improved progression-free survival. We hypothesized that the combination of afatinib with bevacizumab would further improve efficacy, and conducted a phase I trial to test this hypothesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Untreated patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC were enrolled. The primary endpoint was safety. Two doses of afatinib, 40mg/day (level 0) and 30mg/day (level -1), were evaluated in combination with 15mg/kg bevacizumab every 3 weeks. Optimal dosing was determined by dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), with the concentration at which ≤4 of 12 patients experienced toxicity considered the recommended dose. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were enrolled (level 0:5, level -1:14). Three of the five patients at level 0 experienced a DLT, which indicated that this dose was unfeasible. Three patients at level -1 developed a DLT of grade 3 non-hematological toxicity, which was soon resolved. Grade 3 or worse adverse events were experienced by all five patients at dose level 0 (diarrhea in 2, skin rash in 1, hypoxia in 1, and paronychia in 1), and by three patients at level -1 (diarrhea in 2 and anorexia in 1). Among 16 evaluable patients, 1 had a complete response, 12 had partial responses, and 0 had progressive disease. CONCLUSION: Afatinib plus bevacizumab (level -1) was well tolerated and showed evidence of favorable disease control. This combination therapy may represent a potent therapeutic option for patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

DOI： 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.11.025

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to select, for a phase III trial, the more promising of weekly-dose intensive chemotherapy or amrubicin+cisplatin chemotherapy as subsequent therapy after induction chemoradiotherapy for previously untreated limited-disease small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients aged 20-70 years with untreated clinical stage II/III LD-SCLC were eligible. After one cycle of accelerated hyperfractionation thoracic radiotherapy with etoposide plus cisplatin, patients without progression were randomized to either 3 cycles of cisplatin 25mg/m2 (days 1, 8), doxorubicin 40mg/m2 (day 1), etoposide 80mg/m2 (days 1-3), and vincristine 1mg/m2 (day 8) every 2 weeks (CODE) or amrubicin 40mg/m2 (days 1-3) and cisplatin 60mg/m2 (day 1) every 3 weeks (AP). The primary endpoint was the one-year progression-free survival (PFS). The sample size was 72 to select the arm yielding a better one-year PFS (55% vs. 65%) with a probability of 80%. RESULTS: From March 2011 to February 2014, 85 patients were registered. After the induction chemoradiotherapy, 75 patients were randomized to CODE (n=39) or AP (n=36). The one-year PFS (95% confidence interval) was 41.0% (25.7-55.8) in the CODE group and 54.3% (36.6-69.0) in the AP group. Grade 4 neutropenia/grade 3 febrile neutropenia occurred in 47%/16% in the CODE group and 78%/42% in the AP group. CONCLUSION: The one-year PFS was better in the AP group, but it did not reach the expected 55%. Therefore, neither regimen is suitable for a phase III trial.

DOI： 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.04.002

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

Purpose Alectinib is an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) -specific kinase inhibitor that seems to be effective against non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a variety of ALK mutations. The primary analysis of AF-001JP reported a promising overall response rate. To assess progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), patients from the phase II part of AF-001JP were followed up for approximately 3 years. Patients and Methods Oral alectinib 300 mg was administered twice per day to patients with ALK inhibitor-naïve, ALK-positive NSCLC who had progressed after one or more regimens of previous chemotherapy. In this long-term follow-up, efficacy (PFS, OS), correlation between tumor shrinkage and PFS, safety of alectinib, and relief of cancer symptoms were evaluated. Results At the updated data cutoff (September 10, 2015; first patient in August 30, 2011, last patient in April 18, 2012), 25 of 46 phase II patients were still receiving alectinib. Disease progression was confirmed in 18 patients (39%); median PFS was not reached (3-year PFS rate, 62%; 95% CI, 45 to 75). Fourteen patients had brain metastases at baseline; of these, 6 remained in the study without CNS and systemic progression. Tumor shrinkage and PFS showed no correlation. The 3-year OS rate was 78% (13 events). The most common treatment-related adverse event (all grades) was increased blood bilirubin (36.2%). Most cancer symptoms were relieved early, and medication for symptoms was dramatically decreased during alectinib therapy. Conclusion Alectinib was effective in this 3-year follow-up with a favorable safety profile over a long administration period in ALK-positive NSCLC without previous ALK inhibitor treatment.

DOI： 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.5749

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

Limited treatment options are available for stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nivolumab, a programmed cell death-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor antibody, has been shown to be effective for the treatment of NSCLC. The present study investigated the effectiveness and safety of nivolumab in Japanese patients with advanced or recurrent squamous NSCLC that progressed after platinum-containing chemotherapy. In this multicenter phase II study, patients were treated with nivolumab (3 mg/kg, i.v.) every 2 weeks until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity was seen. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) assessed by independent radiology review committee (IRC) and secondary endpoints included a study site-assessed ORR, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response, time to response, best overall response (BOR), and safety. The study included 35 patients from 17 sites in Japan. Patients had IRC-assessed ORR of 25.7% (95% CI 14.2, 42.1) and the study site-assessed ORR was 20.0% (95% CI 10.0, 35.9). Median OS, median time to response and median PFS were 16.3 (95% CI 12.4-25.4), 2.7 (range 1.2-5.5) and 4.2 (95% CI 1.4-7.1) months, respectively. The IRC-assessed BOR was partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease for 25.7%, 28.6%, and 45.7% of patients, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 24 patients (68.6%), most of which resolved with appropriate treatment including steroid therapy or ‎discontinuation of nivolumab. Nivolumab was effective and well tolerated in Japanese patients with advanced or recurrent squamous NSCLC that progressed after platinum-containing chemotherapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: JapicCTI-132072.

DOI： 10.1111/cas.13225

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

Objectives To determine the recommended dose and efficacy/safety of docetaxel combined with resminostat (DR) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with previous platinum-based chemotherapy. Materials and Methods A multicenter, open-label, phase I/II study was performed in Japanese patients with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent NSCLC and prior platinum-based chemotherapy. The recommended phase II dose was determined using a standard 3 + 3 dose design in phase I part. Resminostat was escalated from 400 to 600 mg/day and docetaxel fixed at 75 mg/m2. In phase II part, the patients were randomly assigned to docetaxel alone (75 mg/m2) or DR therapy. Docetaxel was administered on day 1 and resminostat on days 1-5 in the DR group. Treatment was repeated every 21 days until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results A total of 117 patients (phase I part, 9; phase II part, 108) were enrolled. There was no dose-limiting toxicity in phase I part; the recommended dose for resminostat was 600 mg/day with 75 mg/m2 of docetaxel. In phase II part, median PFS (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 4.2 (2.8-5.7) months with docetaxel group and 4.1 (1.5-5.4) months with DR group (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.354, 95% CI: 0.835-2.195; p = 0.209). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events significantly more common with DR group than docetaxel group were leukopenia, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anorexia. Conclusion In Japanese NSCLC patients previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy, DR therapy did not improve PFS compared with docetaxel alone and increased toxicity.

DOI： 10.1007/s10637-017-0435-2

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

BACKGROUND: RET rearrangements are rare oncogenic alterations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Vandetanib is a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor exhibiting RET kinase activity. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of vandetanib in patients with advanced RET-rearranged NSCLC. METHODS: In this open-label, multicentre, phase 2 trial (LURET), patients with advanced RET-rearranged NSCLC continuously received 300 mg of oral vandetanib daily. RET-positive patients were screened using a nationwide genomic screening network of about 200 participating institutions. Primary endpoint was the independently assessed objective response in eligible patients. This study is registered with UMIN-CTR, number UMIN000010095. FINDINGS: Between Feb 7, 2013, and March 19, 2015, 1536 patients with EGFR mutation-negative NSCLC were screened, of whom 34 were RET-positive (2%) and 19 were enrolled. Among 17 eligible patients included in primary analysis, nine (53% [95% CI 28-77]) achieved an objective response, which met the primary endpoint. In the intention-to-treat population of all 19 patients treated with vandetanib, nine (47% [95% CI 24-71]) achieved an objective response. At the data cutoff, median progression-free survival was 4·7 months (95% CI 2·8-8·5). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were hypertension (11 [58%]), diarrhoea (two [11%]), rash (three [16%]), dry skin (one [5%]), and QT prolongation (two [11%]). INTERPRETATION: Vandetanib showed clinical antitumour activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with advanced RET-rearranged NSCLC. Our results define RET rearrangement as a new molecular subgroup of NSCLC suitable for targeted therapy. FUNDING: The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan and the Practical Research for Innovation Cancer Control from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, AMED.

DOI： 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30322-8

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

PURPOSE: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase has been an important target for non-small-cell lung cancer. Several EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are currently approved, and both gefitinib and erlotinib are the most well-known first-generation EGFR-TKIs. This randomized phase III study was conducted to investigate the difference between these two EGFR-TKIs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously treated patients with lung adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to receive gefitinib or erlotinib. This study aimed to investigate the noninferiority of gefitinib compared with erlotinib. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Five hundred sixty-one patients were randomly assigned, including 401 patients (71.7%) with EGFR mutation. All baseline factors (except performance status) were balanced between the arms. Median PFS and overall survival times for gefitinib and erlotinib were 6.5 and 7.5 months (hazard ratio [HR], 1.125; 95% CI, 0.940 to 1.347; P = .257) and 22.8 and 24.5 months (HR, 1.038; 95% CI, 0.833 to 1.294; P = .768), respectively. The response rates for gefitinib and erlotinib were 45.9% and 44.1%, respectively. Median PFS times in EGFR mutation-positive patients receiving gefitinib versus erlotinib were 8.3 and 10.0 months, respectively (HR, 1.093; 95% CI, 0.879 to 1.358; P = .424). The primary grade 3 or 4 toxicities were rash (2.2% for gefitinib v 18.1% for erlotinib) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevation (6.1%/13.0% for gefitinib v 2.2%/3.3% for erlotinib). CONCLUSION: The study did not demonstrate noninferiority of gefitinib compared with erlotinib in terms of PFS in patients with lung adenocarcinoma according to the predefined criteria.

DOI： 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.4154

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)   Publisher：OXFORD UNIV PRESS  

This paper reports the result of the first phase III study of comparing the efficacy of first- and second-generation 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, palonosetron and granisetron, in the triplet regimen with dexamethasone and aprepitant for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting after highly emetogenic chemotherapy.There has been no phase III study of comparing the efficacy of first- and second-generation 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in the triplet regimen with dexamethasone and aprepitant for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting after highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC).
Patients with a malignant solid tumor who would receive HEC containing 50 mg/m(2) or more cisplatin were randomly assigned to either palonosetron (0.75 mg) arm (Arm P) or granisetron (1 mg) arm (Arm G), on day 1, both arms with dexamethasone (12 mg on day 1 and 8 mg on days 2-4) and aprepitant (125 mg on day 1 and 80 mg on days 2-3). The primary end point was complete response (CR; no vomiting/retching and no rescue medication) at the 0-120 h period and secondary end points included complete control (CC; no vomiting/retching, no rescue medication, and no more than mild nausea) and total control (TC; no vomiting/retching, no rescue medication, and no nausea).
Between July 2011 and June 2012, 842 patients were enrolled. Of 827 evaluable, 272 of 414 patients (65.7%) in Arm P had a CR at the 0-120 h period when compared with 244 of 413 (59.1%) in Arm G (P = 0.0539). Both arms had the same CR rate of 91.8% at the acute (0-24 h) period, while at the delayed (24-120 h) period, Arm P had a significantly higher CR rate than Arm G (67.2% versus 59.1%; P = 0.0142). In secondary end points, Arm P had significantly higher rates than Arm G at the 0-120 h period (CC rate: 63.8% versus 55.9%, P = 0.0234; TC rate: 47.6% versus 40.7%, P = 0.0369) and delayed periods (CC rate: 65.2% versus 55.9%, P = 0.0053; TC rate: 48.6% versus 41.4%, P = 0.0369).
The present study did not show the superiority of palonosetron when compared with granisetron in the triplet regimen regarding the primary end point.
UMIN000004863.

DOI： 10.1093/annonc/mdw220

Web of Science

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

BACKGROUND: The addition of bevacizumab to cytotoxic agents prolongs survival in patients with nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To date, there is no evidence to suggest that treatment with a cytotoxic agent plus bevacizumab is more effective than a cytotoxic agent alone for nonsquamous NSCLC in elderly patients. We conducted a feasibility study of pemetrexed plus bevacizumab as a first-line treatment for advanced or recurrent nonsquamous NSCLC in elderly patients. METHODS: Major eligibility and exclusion criteria included: chemotherapy-naive status; non-fitness for bolus combination chemotherapy; stage III/IV or relapsed nonsquamous NSCLC; age ≥70; performance status 0-1; absence of brain metastasis; and no history of hemoptysis and thoracic irradiation. Pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2)) and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) were administered intravenously on day 1, and repeated every 3 weeks thereafter. The primary endpoint was safety, and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the percentage of patients who completed ≥3 cycles. RESULTS: From October 2010 to April 2012, a total of 12 patients were enrolled. No dose-limiting toxicity or treatment-related deaths were observed. Three patients achieved PR, and the ORR was 25 %. The median PFS and OS were 5.4 months (95 % CI 1.1-8.8 months) and 13.6 months (95 % CI 5.3-15.6 months), respectively. Seven of 12 patients (58 %) received ≥3 cycles. CONCLUSIONS: Pemetrexed plus bevacizumab in the treatment of elderly patients with nonsquamous NSCLC was well tolerated and shows promise as first-line treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trial Registry; UMIN000004263 . Registered on 25 September, 2010.

DOI： 10.1186/s12885-016-2338-6

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are now key agents in treating EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The efficacy of gefitinib or erlotinib monotherapy can be predicted by the development of a skin rash. However, it has not been fully evaluated if this is the case with afatinib monotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 49 consecutive patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received afatinib therapy between 2009 and 2015. The relationship of several toxicities with tumor response was examined. RESULTS: Grade 2, or more severe, common adverse events (AEs) included skin rash in 17 patients (35 %), diarrhea in 19 (39 %) and mucositis in 15 (31 %). Of these, the number of patients who developed ≥Grade 2 AEs during the first week after the initiation of afatinib therapy was: five patients had skin rash (10 %), 12 patients had diarrhea (25 %) and four patients had mucositis (8 %). As for an objective response, 21 (43 %) of the 49 had a partial response. Associating the AEs with the antitumor effect, those who had a ≥Grade 2 skin rash within the first week tended to have a greater tumor response compared with those without a rash (80 vs. 39 %; p = 0.077). CONCLUSION: Our small study demonstrated that the early development of a skin rash might be associated with the response to afatinib monotherapy.

DOI： 10.1007/s00280-015-2910-9

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy has been established as a standard treatment option in the first-line setting for advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there has been no evidence to support the use of bevacizumab beyond disease progression in such patients. METHODS: West Japan Oncology Group 5910L was designed as a multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 2 trial of docetaxel versus docetaxel plus bevacizumab every 3 weeks for patients with recurrent or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC whose disease had progressed after first-line treatment with bevacizumab plus a platinum-based doublet. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: One hundred patients were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel (n = 50) or docetaxel plus bevacizumab (n = 50), and this yielded median PFS times of 3.4 and 4.4 months, respectively, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.71 and a stratified log-rank P value of .058, which met the predefined criterion for statistical significance (P < .2). The median overall survival also tended to be longer in the docetaxel plus bevacizumab group (13.1 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.6-21.4 months) versus the docetaxel group (11.0 months; 95% CI, 7.6-16.1 months) with an HR of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.46-1.19; stratified log-rank P = .11). No unexpected or severe adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Further evaluation of bevacizumab beyond disease progression is warranted for patients with advanced NSCLC whose disease has progressed after treatment with bevacizumab plus a platinum-based doublet.

DOI： 10.1002/cncr.29893

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)   Publisher：OXFORD UNIV PRESS  

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusions need to be accurately and efficiently detected for ALK inhibitor therapy. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) remains the reference test. Although increasing data are supporting that ALK immunohistochemistry (IHC) is highly concordant with FISH, IHC screening needed to be clinically and prospectively validated.
In the AF-001JP trial for alectinib, 436 patients were screened for ALK fusions through IHC (n = 384) confirmed with FISH (n = 181), multiplex RT-PCR (n = 68), or both (n = 16). IHC results were scored with iScore.
ALK fusion was positive in 137 patients and negative in 250 patients. Since the presence of cancer cells in the samples for RT-PCR was not confirmed, ALK fusion negativity could not be ascertained in 49 patients. IHC interpreted with iScore showed a 99.4% (173/174) concordance with FISH. All 41 patients who had iScore 3 and were enrolled in phase II showed at least 30% tumor reduction with 92.7% overall response rate. Two IHC-positive patients with an atypical FISH pattern responded to ALK inhibitor therapy. The reduction rate was not correlated with IHC staining intensity.
Our study showed (i) that when sufficiently sensitive and appropriately interpreted, IHC can be a stand-alone diagnostic for ALK inhibitor therapies; (ii) that when atypical FISH patterns are accompanied by IHC positivity, the patients should be considered as candidates for ALK inhibitor therapies, and (iii) that the expression level of ALK fusion is not related to the level of response to ALK inhibitors and is thus not required for patient selection.
JapicCTI-101264 (This study is registered with the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center).

DOI： 10.1093/annonc/mdv501

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

Herein, we describe an ongoing phase II trial in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with mutated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Patients with chemotherapy-naive locally advanced disease with active EGFR mutations will receive the induction treatment, specified as gefitinib monotherapy (250 mg/body) for 8 weeks. Patients whose disease has not progressed during the induction therapy will receive cisplatin and docetaxel (40 mg/m(2)) on days 1, 8, 29, and 36, and concurrent 3-dimensional conformal thoracic radiotherapy with a single daily fraction of 2 Gy, for 5 consecutive days each week to provide a total dose of 60 Gy. The primary end point is overall survival at 24 months. A target sample size of 21 evaluable patients is considered sufficient to validate an expected rate of 85%, and 60% would be the lower limit of interest, with 80% power and a 1-sided α of 5%. Secondary end points include toxicity, response rate, and overall survival. This study will clarify whether tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeted to EGFR can produce a maximal effect in selected NSCLC patients with the relevant driver mutation, even in the locally advanced setting.

DOI： 10.1016/j.cllc.2015.08.004

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

OBJECTIVE: Nivolumab is a fully human IgG4 programmed cell death 1 immune checkpoint inhibitor monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nivolumab in Japanese patients with advanced or recurrent non-squamous NSCLC. METHODS: In this multicentre phase II study, patients with advanced or recurrent non-squamous NSCLC, which had progressed after platinum-containing chemotherapy, were treated with nivolumab 3 mg/kg, intravenously every 2 weeks until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity was observed. The primary end point was independent radiology review committee (IRC) assessed overall response rate (ORR) and the secondary endpoints included ORR (investigator assessed), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response, time to response, best overall response, and safety. RESULTS: 76 patients were enrolled across 19 sites in Japan. The ORR (IRC assessed) was 22.4% (95% CI 14.5% to 32.9%). The median PFS and OS were 2.8 months (95% CI 1.4 to 3.4) and 17.1 months (95% CI 13.3 to 23.0), respectively. The OS rate at 1 year was 68.0% (95% CI 56.2% to 77.3%). Current/former smokers were more responsive to treatment than non-smokers (ORR 29.1% vs 4.8%). Patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation wild type/unknown showed higher ORR compared with EGFR mutation-positive patients (ORR 28.6% vs 5.0%) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression was likely associated with higher ORR, longer PFS and OS. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher were reported in 17 patients; these events resolved or were resolving with appropriate treatment including steroid therapy or discontinuation of nivolumab. CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab was well tolerated and showed clinical efficacy in Japanese patients with non-squamous NSCLC progressed after platinum-containing chemotherapy, especially in those with a history of smoking, wild type/unknown EGFR mutation status or positive PD-L1 expression. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: JapicCTI-132073.

DOI： 10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000108

PubMed

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

PURPOSE: Whether bevacizumab enhances the effect of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor gefitinib on EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) remains unknown. We conducted a phase II trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of gefitinib when combined with bevacizumab as first-line therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR gene mutations. METHODS: In this trial, 42 patients with a performance status of 0 to 2 received gefitinib (250 mg/d) and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg, every 3 weeks). The primary end point of this study was the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate. We assumed that a 1-year PFS rate of 55% would indicate potential usefulness and that a 1-year PFS rate of 40% would constitute the lower limit of interest. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were enrolled in the study with a median age of 73 (range 42-86) years. Activating EGFR gene mutations included exon 19 deletion (57%) and L858R point mutations in exon 21 (38%). The objective response rate was 73.8% and included two complete responses. The 1-year PFS rate and median PFS time were 56.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 39.9-70.5) and 14.4 months (95% CI 10.1-19.2), respectively. The median PFS differed significantly between EGFR exon 19 deletion and the L858R point mutation (18.0 versus 9.4 months, respectively; p = 0.006). The median overall survival had not yet been reached. Severe adverse events included grade 3 skin rash (15%), hypertension (17%), aspartate transaminase/alanine aminotransferase elevation (17%), proteinuria (7%), intracranial hemorrhage (2%), and grade 4 perforation of the digestive tract (2%). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: Gefitinib in combination with bevacizumab as first-line therapy seems to be a favorable and well-tolerated treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC with activating EGFR gene mutations, especially those with EGFR exon 19 deletion mutations, although the primary end point was not met because the lower limit of the CI was less than 40%.

DOI： 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000434

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

BACKGROUND: Although cisplatin-based chemotherapy combined with thoracic irradiation (TRT) is a standard treatment for unresectable, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), this treatment outcome has remained unsatisfactory. We had previously conducted a phase I trial of cisplatin plus S-1, an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative, and TRT, which were safe and effective. METHODS: In this phase II trial, 48 patients with stage III NSCLC received cisplatin (40mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 29 and 36) and S-1 (80mg/m(2) on days 1-14 and 29-42) and TRT (60Gy). The primary endpoint was the response rate. RESULTS: A partial response was observed in 37 patients (77%; 95% confidence interval: 63-88%). At a median follow up of 54 months, the median progression-free survival and median survival time were 9.3 and 31.3 months, respectively. No difference in efficacy was observed when the patients were stratified by histology. Toxicities were generally mild except for grade 3 or worse febrile neutropenia and pneumonitis of 8% and 4%, respectively. No patient developed severe esophagitis. At the time of this analysis, 35 (73%) of the 48 patients recurred; 15 (31%) showed distant metastasis, 17 (35%) had loco-regional disease, and 2 (4%) showed both loco-regional disease and distant metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: This chemoradiotherapy regimen yielded a relatively favorable efficacy with mild toxicities in patients with locally advanced NSCLC.

DOI： 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.11.001

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

PURPOSE: This Phase I, open-label, single-arm, dose-escalation study aimed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I/II) neutralizing antibody, MEDI-573, in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumours refractory to standard therapy or for which no standard therapy exists. The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and antitumour activity of MEDI-573 were also evaluated. METHODS: Three cohorts of patients received MEDI-573 in escalating order: cohort 1, 5 mg/kg on Day 1, 8 and 15; cohort 2, 15 mg/kg on Day 1, 8 and 15; cohort 3, 45 mg/kg on Day 1, of 21-day cycles. RESULTS: Ten patients who received at least one dose of MEDI-573 were evaluated. The median number of treatment cycles was 2.0 (range 1-6) and the median number of MEDI-573 doses received was 4.0 (range 1-17). The most commonly reported drug-related adverse events were fatigue (n = 2 patients), pyrexia (n = 2), diarrhoea (n = 2) and electrocardiogram QT prolongation (n = 2). No patients experienced a dose-limiting toxicity. Pharmacokinetics of MEDI-573 were linear with a dose-dependent increase. There were no complete or partial responses; four patients had an overall best response of stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: MEDI-573 is well tolerated at the doses investigated.

DOI： 10.1007/s10637-014-0170-x

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

BACKGROUND: Although thoracic irradiation (TRT) is a standard treatment for elderly patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC), treatment outcomes are poor. We previously reported a phase I trial combining S-1, an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative, and thoracic radiation, which yielded safe and effective outcomes. METHODS: In this phase II trial, 30 patients aged 76 years or older with LA-NSCLC received S-1 (80 mg/m(2) on days 1-14 and 29-42) and TRT (60Gy). The primary end-point was the response rate. RESULTS: The median age and pre-treatment Charlson score were 79 years and 1, respectively. The mean proportions of the actual doses of S-1 and TRT delivered relative to the planned doses were 95% and 98%, respectively. Partial responses were observed in 19 patients (63%; 95% confidence interval: 45-82%), which did not attain the end-point. At a median follow-up time of 23.7 months, the median progression-free survival and median survival times were 13.0 months and 27.9 months, respectively. No difference in efficacy was observed upon stratification by tumour histology. Toxicities were generally mild, except for grade 3 or greater febrile neutropenia and pneumonitis in 7% and 10% of patients, respectively. No patient developed severe oesophagitis. CONCLUSIONS: Although the primary end-point was not met, concurrent S-1 chemotherapy and radiotherapy yielded favourable survival data. Also, the combined treatment was well-tolerated in elderly patients with LA-NSCLC.

DOI： 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.07.024

PubMed

researchmap

Language：Japanese  

A 54-year-old man with pulmonary non-tuberculous mycobacteriosis( pulmonary NTM) who had been treated by antituberculous chemotherapy, developed a new nodule of 1.3 cm in size in the segment 1/2 of the right upper lobe. The cavity of 3.5 cm in size in the segment 6 of the right lower lobe from which Mycobacterium intracellulare was bronchoscopically detected, was suspected to be pulmonary NTM lesion. Since lung cancer was highly suspected by radiological examinations, right upper lobectomy and S6 segmentectomy were performed. Pathological diagnosis for the right upper lobe nodule was adenocarcinoma.

PubMed

researchmap

Other Link： https://search.jamas.or.jp/index.php?module=Default&action=Link&pub_year=2014&ichushi_jid=J00349&link_issn=&doc_id=20140704210010&doc_link_id=40020134623&url=https%3A%2F%2Fci.nii.ac.jp%2Fnaid%2F40020134623&type=CiNii&icon=https%3A%2F%2Fjk04.jamas.or.jp%2Ficon%2F00003_1.gif

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

PURPOSE: Early administration of both epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) monotherapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy is crucial for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring EGFR mutations. We investigated the effect of first-line administration of these therapies on subsequent therapy in NSCLC patients. METHODS: This study enrolled 63 consecutive patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC and good performance status (PS) and who underwent first-line EGFR-TKI therapy or standard cytotoxic chemotherapy and then had progressive disease, from 2007 to 2011. The ability of each patient to receive the other therapy after first-line treatment failure was assessed. RESULTS: In the first-line setting, 23 and 40 patients received EGFR-TKI therapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy, respectively. At relapse, the EGFR-TKI therapy group showed more frequent PS deterioration (p = 0.042) and greater likelihood of symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) relapse (p = 0.093) compared with the cytotoxic chemotherapy group. Nine (39 %) of 23 patients initially receiving EGFR-TKI therapy could not receive standard cytotoxic therapy after progression mainly due to symptomatic CNS relapse. Only one (3 %) of 40 initially treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy failed to receive subsequent EGFR-TKI therapy (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed a correlation between the first-line therapy and the failure to switch to the other therapy after disease progression (OR 48.605, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: In this study, patients who could not receive both EGFR-TKI therapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy in the early-line setting were included more in the first-line EGFR-TKI group, suggesting a potential risk associated with missing the timing of administration of subsequent therapy. Further investigation is warranted to detect their pretreatment clinical or molecular characteristics for development of a new treatment strategy specific for such subpopulation.

DOI： 10.1007/s00280-014-2425-9

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

OBJECTIVES: We conducted an open-label, multicenter, single-arm study to confirm the efficacy and safety of amrubicin (AMR), a topoisomerase II inhibitor, for treating refractory small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with chemotherapy-refractory SCLC received 40 mg/m(2) AMR for 3 consecutive days, every 21 days. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR) and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: Between November 2009 and February 2011, 82 patients were enrolled. Each patient received a median of four treatment cycles (range, 1-22 cycles). ORR was 32.9% [P<0.0001 by the exact binomial test for the null hypothesis that ORR ≤ 10%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 22.9-44.2%]. The median PFS and OS periods were 3.5 months (95% CI, 3.0-4.3 months) and 8.9 months (95% CI, 7.6-11.3 months), respectively. Significant differences in ORR (21.4% v 45.0%; P=0.034), PFS (median, 2.9 v 5.1 months; P=0.0009), and OS (median, 7.9 v 13.1 months; P=0.0128) were observed between patients previously treated with etoposide and others. Neutropenia was the most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events (93.9%), and febrile neutropenia developed in 26.8% patients. No treatment-related death occurred. CONCLUSIONS: AMR monotherapy can be considered an effective and safe treatment option for refractory SCLC. Previous chemotherapy with etoposide may influence AMR efficacy.

DOI： 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.01.012

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

DOI： 10.1007/s10637-013-9994-z

Scopus

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

AIM: Assessment of the efficacy of docetaxel plus carboplatin vs. paclitaxel plus carboplatin in Japanese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naïve patients were randomly assigned at a ratio of 2 to 1 to receive six cycles of either docetaxel (60 mg/m(2)) plus carboplatin [area under the curve (AUC)=6 mg/ml min] or paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)) plus carboplatin (same dose), on day 1 every 21 days. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: A total of 90 patients were enrolled. Overall response rate, median PFS and median survival time in the docetaxel-plus-carboplatin group and the paclitaxel-plus-carboplatin group were 23% vs. 33%, 4.8 months vs. 5.1 months, and 17.6 months vs. 15.6 months, respectively. The docetaxel-plus-carboplatin group had a higher incidence of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (88% vs. 60%). CONCLUSION: Both regimens were similarly effective in Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC.

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

INTRODUCTION: This study prospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed and carboplatin followed by maintenance pemetrexed in chemo-naïve patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: A total of 109 patients received pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (area under the curve = 6 mg/mL·min) every 21 days. For patients without disease progression after 4 cycles, pemetrexed was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Pre-planned subgroup analysis results based on the presence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are also presented. RESULTS: The median number of treatment cycles was 5 (range: 1-30) in the entire study period. Most of the grade ≥ 3 toxicities observed were hematologic in nature, with no increase in the relative incidence associated with continuation maintenance therapy with pemetrexed. Among the 106 total patients assessable for efficacy, the objective response rate was 35.8 %, median progression free survival (PFS) 5.7 months, and median overall survival (OS) 20.2 months. Sixty patients received maintenance pemetrexed (median: 4 cycles, range: 1-26 cycles); median PFS from the beginning of induction treatment was 7.5 months. From the subgroup analysis for EGFR mutation status, the median OS of EGFR wild-type patients (n=61) was 20.2 months. CONCLUSIONS: Pemetrexed/carboplatin followed by pemetrexed was well tolerated and active for front-line treatment of advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. Encouraging survival outcomes were observed even in EGFR-wild type patients.

DOI： 10.1007/s10637-013-9941-z

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

PURPOSE: In a large multicenter international phase III study (CA031) of nab-paclitaxel (nab-P, 130 nm albumin-bound paclitaxel particles) + carboplatin (C) vs solvent-based paclitaxel (sb-P) + C, conducted in 6 countries including Japan, nab-PC produced significantly higher overall response rate (ORR), primary end point compared with sb-PC, and acceptable safety profile. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of nab-PC vs sb-PC in Japanese patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were enrolled in the CA031 study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the CA031 study, a total of 1052 patients were randomized to receive either nab-P 100 mg/m(2) weekly or sb-P 200 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks both in combination with C at area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) = 6 on day 1 of each 3-week cycle. This analysis included 149 Japanese patients with previously untreated stage IIIB or IV NSCLC. RESULTS: The baseline and histologic characteristics of patients were well balanced between the two arms. ORR was higher with nab-PC vs sb-PC (35% vs 27%; response rate ratio = 1.318). Progression-free survival (median 6.9 vs 5.6 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.845) and overall survival (median 16.7 vs 15.9 months; HR = 0.930) were better with nab-PC vs sb-PC. Of the grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events, anemia and thrombocytopenia were more common in nab-PC arm, but sensory neuropathy was less common. CONCLUSION: The nab-PC treatment yielded promising results regarding the efficacy endpoint, and it was generally well tolerated as first-line therapy for Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC.

DOI： 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.02.020

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

BACKGROUND: Currently, crizotinib is the only drug that has been approved for treatment of ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to study the activity and safety of CH5424802, a potent, selective, and orally available ALK inhibitor. METHODS: In this multicentre, single-arm, open-label, phase 1-2 study of CH5424802, we recruited ALK inhibitor-naive patients with ALK-rearranged advanced NSCLC from 13 hospitals in Japan. In the phase 1 portion of the study, patients received CH5424802 orally twice daily by dose escalation. The primary endpoints of the phase 1 were dose limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacokinetic parameters. In the phase 2 portion of the study, patients received CH5424802 at the recommended dose identified in the phase 1 portion of the study orally twice a day. The primary endpoint of the phase 2 was the proportion of patients who had an objective response. Treatment was continued in 21-day cycles until disease progression, intolerable adverse events, or withdrawal of consent. The analysis was done by intent to treat. This study is registered with the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center, number JapicCTI-101264. FINDINGS: Patients were enrolled between Sept 10, 2010, and April 18, 2012. The data cutoff date was July 31, 2012. In the phase 1 portion, 24 patients were treated at doses of 20-300 mg twice daily. No DLTs or adverse events of grade 4 were noted up to the highest dose; thus 300 mg twice daily was the recommended phase 2 dose. In the phase 2 portion of the study, 46 patients were treated with the recommended dose, of whom 43 achieved an objective response (93.5%, 95% CI 82.1-98.6) including two complete responses (4.3%, 0.5-14.8) and 41 partial responses (89.1%, 76.4-96.4). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 were recorded in 12 (26%) of 46 patients, including two patients each experiencing decreased neutrophil count and increased blood creatine phosphokinase. Serious adverse events occurred in five patients (11%). No grade 4 adverse events or deaths were reported. The study is still ongoing, since 40 of the 46 patients in the phase 2 portion remain on treatment. INTERPRETATION: CH5424802 is well tolerated and highly active in patients with advanced ALK-rearranged NSCLC. FUNDING: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd.

DOI： 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70142-6

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

PURPOSE: Follow-up by chest CT is often performed routinely after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for primary lung cancer. We investigated how often periodical chest CT detected lung-cancer related chest events (failure in the chest, new primary lung cancer), and how often chest CT follow-ups led to curative intent salvage treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2006 and 2009, 90 stage I primary lung cancers in 86 patients received SBRT. In principle, chest CT was scheduled every 2-3 months in the first two years, and every 3-4 months thereafter. RESULTS: Median time to follow-up by chest CT was 26 months (1-61 months). Twenty-seven lung-cancer related chest events were detected by periodical chest CT after SBRT. The three-year lung-cancer related chest event free rate was 62 %. It was possible to apply curative-intent salvage treatment to 56 % of the lung-cancer related chest events. The two-year overall survival rate was 66 % among the 13 patients who received curative-intent salvage treatment (radiotherapy, 11; surgery, 2). CONCLUSION: Post-SBRT lung-cancer related chest events (as detected by periodical chest CT) were not uncommon (approximately 40 % at 3 years from SBRT), and it was possible to treat more than half of these lesions with curative-intent salvage treatment.

DOI： 10.1007/s11604-012-0107-2

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

BACKGROUND: The survival advantage achieved by existing anti-cancer agents as second-line therapy for relapsed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is modest and further improvement of treatment outcome is desired. Combination chemotherapy with irinotecan and amrubicin for advanced NSCLC has not been fully evaluated. METHODS: The primary endpoint of this phase II clinical trial was objective response. Patients with NSCLC who had been treated previously with one or two chemotherapy agents were enrolled. Irinotecan and amrubicin were both administered on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle, at doses of 100 mg/m(2) and 40 mg/m(2), respectively. RESULTS: Between 2004 and 2006, 31 patients received a total of 101 courses; the median number of courses administered was three (range, one to six). Objective response was obtained in nine of the 31 patients (29.0% response rate; 95% confidence interval (CI), 12.1-46.0%). With a median follow-up time of 43.9 months, median survival time and the median progression-free survival time were 14.2 and 4.0 months, respectively. Myelosuppression was the most frequently observed adverse event, with grade 3/4 neutropenia in 51% of patients. Febrile neutropenia developed after nine courses (9%) and resulted in one treatment-related death. Cardiac toxicity and diarrhea, possibly specific for both agents, were infrequent and manageable. CONCLUSION: Combination chemotherapy with irinotecan and amrubicin is effective in patients with NSCLC but showed moderate toxicities in second- or third-line settings.

DOI： 10.3109/0284186X.2011.648342

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

PURPOSE: To identify factors affecting local control of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung tumors including primary lung cancer and metastatic lung tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between June 2006 and June 2009, 159 lung tumors in 144 patients (primary lung cancer, 128; metastatic lung tumor, 31) were treated with SBRT with 48-60 Gy (mean 50.1 Gy) in 4-5 fractions. Higher doses were given to larger tumors and metastatic tumors in principle. Assessed factors were age, gender, tumor origin (primary vs. metastatic), histological subtype, tumor size, tumor appearance (solid vs. ground glass opacity), maximum standardized uptake value of positron emission tomography using (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D: -glucose, and SBRT doses. RESULTS: Follow-up time was 1-60 months (median 18 months). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year local failure-free rates of all lesions were 90, 80, and 77 %, respectively. On univariate analysis, metastatic tumors (p < 0.0001), solid tumors (p = 0.0246), and higher SBRT doses (p = 0.0334) were the statistically significant unfavorable factors for local control. On multivariate analysis, only tumor origin was statistically significant (p = 0.0027). The 2-year local failure-free rates of primary lung cancer and metastatic lung tumors were 87 and 50 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A metastatic tumor was the only independently significant unfavorable factor for local control after SBRT.

DOI： 10.1007/s11604-012-0071-x

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

BACKGROUND: Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) is a Cremophor EL-free formulation of paclitaxel newly designed to avoid solvent-related toxicities. We have evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and tumor response profile of weekly nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m(2)) infusion together with administration of carboplatin at an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 every 3 weeks in Japanese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m(2)) was administered without steroid or antihistamine premedication as a 30-min intravenous infusion once a week in combination with carboplatin at an AUC of 6 on day 1 of repeated 21-day cycles. The pharmacokinetics of both drugs were analyzed, and both adverse events and treatment response were monitored. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were enrolled in the study. The most frequent treatment-related toxicities of grade 3 or 4 were neutropenia (67%), leukopenia (50%), and anemia (22%). No severe hypersensitivity reactions were observed despite the lack of premedication, and no unexpected or new toxicities were detected. Pharmacokinetics analysis did not reveal any substantial drug-drug interactions. Seven partial responses were observed among the 18 evaluable patients, yielding a treatment response rate of 38.9%. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m(2)) administered weekly and carboplatin at an AUC of 6 every 3 weeks was well tolerated in Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC. This combination therapy also showed promising antitumor activity and was not associated with relevant pharmacokinetic interactions.

DOI： 10.1007/s10637-011-9674-9

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

PURPOSE: Dose-fractionation schedules of palliative or salvage radiotherapy (RT) for recurrence of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are various because they highly depend on patient prognosis. For optimal selection of dose-fractionation schedules, factors affecting survival time after recurrence were examined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1992 to 2005, 115 patients with stage III NSCLC received curative-intent concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Among these patients, 74 underwent recurrence and were reviewed. Evaluated factors were age at recurrence, gender, initial stage, histological subtype, initial radiation-field size, recurrent patterns (locoregional alone vs. distant ± locoregional), time to recurrence (≤6 vs. >6 months), and treatment for recurrence (chemotherapy, RT). RESULTS: Median follow-up time after recurrence was 7 (range 0-59) months. One- and 2-year overall survival rates after recurrence were 28 and 11%, respectively. Based on multivariate analysis, time to recurrence (p = 0.0001) and administration of chemotherapy for recurrence (p = 0.0190) were the independently significant factors. CONCLUSIONS: Early recurrence was the most significant factor for survival after post-CCRT recurrence of NSCLC. Administration of chemotherapy for recurrence was also a significant factor, whereas RT for recurrence was not significant. When RT was given to patients with post-CCRT recurrence of NSCLC, dose-fractionated schedules should be determined considering these factors.

DOI： 10.1007/s11604-011-0040-9

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

BACKGROUND/AIM: Although small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is sensitive to anticancer agents, most patients with SCLC experience relapse and die within two years. Here, we examined the relationship between natural killer (NK) cells and adhesion molecules on SCLC cell lines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The expression levels of HLA class I, β2-microglobulin, Fas/Apo-1 receptor (FAS) and adhesion molecules on SCLC cell lines were examined by flow cytometry. The cytotoxicity of activated NK cells from SCLC patients was examined using (51)Cr-release assay. RESULTS: HLA class I antigen and β2-microglobulin expression levels in SCLC cell lines were lower than those in healthy volunteers. SCLC cell lines were susceptible to lysis by activated NK cells but this showed no correlation with expression levels of adhesion molecules. CONCLUSION: Target cell susceptibility to activated NK cells from five SCLC patients correlated with survival benefit; target cell susceptibility to activated NK cells may be a surrogate marker of outcome for patients with SCLC.

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

BACKGROUNDS: Chemotherapy is a mainstay in the treatment of extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC), although the survival benefit remains modest. We conducted a phase II trial of amrubicin (a topoisomerase II inhibitor) and topotecan (a topoisomerase I inhibitor) in chemotherapy-naïve and relapsed SCLC patients. METHODS: Amrubicin (35 mg/m(2)) and topotecan (0.75 mg/m(2)) were administered on days 3-5 and 1-5, respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) was set as the primary endpoint, which was assessed separately in chemotherapy-naïve and relapsed cases. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were enrolled (chemotherapy-naïve 31, relapsed 28). The ORRs were 74% and 43% in the chemotherapy-naïve and relapsed cases, respectively. Survival data were also promising, with a median progression-free survival time and median survival time of 5.3 and 14.9 months and 4.7 and 10.2 months in the chemotherapy-naïve and relapsed cases, respectively. Even refractory-relapsed cases responded to the treatment favorably (27% ORR). The primary toxicity was myelosuppression with grades 3 or 4 neutropenia in 97% of the patients, which led to grades 3 or 4 febrile neutropenia in 41% of the patients and two toxic deaths. CONCLUSION: This phase II study showed the favorable efficacy and moderate safety profiles of a topotecan and amrubicin two-drug combination especially in relapsed patients with ED-SCLC.

DOI： 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.01.018

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

BACKGROUND: Standard second-line chemotherapies for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been established but have limited clinical relevance. S-1 is a recently developed agent with potential activity against NSCLC. METHODS: Patients with confirmed NSCLC recurrence after previous single- or two-regimen chemotherapy with platinum, performance status of 0 to 1, adequate organ functions, and measurable lesions were treated with S-1 (60 mg/m/d, twice a day) on days 1 to 14 and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m) on days 8 and 15, which were repeated every 3 weeks until tumor progression. RESULTS: Treatment was administered for a median of 4 courses (range, 1-13) over a median of 125-day period in 34 patients. The overall response rate was 23.5% (no complete response and eight partial response; 95% confidence interval: 9.1-38.0%). The median progression-free and overall survival times were 6.6 and 19.9 months, respectively. The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 58.8 and 30.9%, respectively. Toxicity was mild during the entire treatment period, except for three grade 3 interstitial pneumonia. CONCLUSION: The primary end point was met with the relatively high overall response rate. Randomized phase III studies for elucidating survival outcome of the regimen are warranted.

DOI： 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181f7c76a

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

S-1, an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative, is effective against advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with mild toxicity and synergistic effects with radiation in preclinical trials. In this phase I study, we evaluated the dose-limiting toxicity and recommended dose of S-1 for a future phase II study when administered concurrently with thoracic radiation (total dose of 60 Gy at 2 Gy per daily fraction) in elderly patients (>75 years old) with localized advanced NSCLC. S-1 was administered on days 1-14 and 29-42 at the following dosages: 60, 70, and 80 mg/m(2)/day. Twenty-two previously untreated patients were enrolled in this study. Dose-limiting toxicity included febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, stomatitis, and pneumonitis. One patient had grade 5 radiation pneumonitis. No other patient experienced radiation pneumonitis or esophagitis exceeding grade 2. The recommended dose for S-1 was determined to be 80 mg/m(2)/day, which produced an overall response rate of 75% (n=12). The median progression-free survival time was 11.5 months (95% confidence interval: 7.1-15.8 months) with a median follow-up time of 27.9 months. These results indicate that concurrent treatment with S-1 and thoracic radiation is a feasible option for NSCLC in the elderly. A phase II study is currently under way.

DOI： 10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.04.012

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

INTRODUCTION: This study explores patient preferences for involvement in lung cancer treatment decisions and the extent of concordance between the views of patients and physicians on decisional roles. The impact of demographic and psychosocial characteristics on the decisional role of patients is also examined. METHODS: Patients with relapsed non-small cell lung cancer who were candidates for a phase II trial of erlotinib monotherapy were recruited. Patients were interviewed after they had learned of their relapse and the treatment decision had been made but before pharmacologic intervention. RESULTS: Most of the 28 participants were married, had a smoking history, and were well educated. They reported moderate levels of depression and anxiety. Initially, 14% of the patients reported a preference for active decision making; later, 29% believed that the primary responsibility for the treatment decision had been theirs. Only 54% of the patients agreed with the physician's assessment of how the treatment decision was made (κ = 0.31; test of symmetry, p = 0.23). The depression score was significantly associated with a patient's preferred level of control (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The limited concordance between patient preference and perception and between patient and physician perceptions regarding how the treatment decision was made suggests that physicians should more accurately identify patient preferences by directly asking patients at the beginning of each clinical encounter.

DOI： 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181f1c8cb

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the efficacy of docetaxel and cisplatin (DP) chemotherapy with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) for patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients age 75 years or younger with LA-NSCLC, stratified by performance status, stage, and institution, were randomly assigned to two arms consisting of DP (docetaxel 40 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 40 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 29, and 36) or mitomycin, vindesine, and cisplatin (MVP) chemotherapy with concurrent TRT. RESULTS: Between July 2000 and July 2005, 200 patients were allocated into either the DP or MVP arm. The survival time at 2 years, a primary end point, was favorable to the DP arm (P = .059 by a stratified log-rank test as a planned analysis and P = .044 by an early-period, weighted log-rank as an unplanned analysis). There was a trend toward improved response rate, 2-year survival rate, median progression-free time, and median survival in the DP arm (78.8%, 60.3%,13.4 months, and 26.8 months, respectively) compared with the MVP arm (70.3%, 48.1%, 10.5 months, and 23.7 months, respectively), which was not statistically significant (P > .05). Grade 3 febrile neutropenia occurred more often in the MVP arm than in the DP arm (39% v 22%, respectively; P = .012), and grade 3 to 4 radiation esophagitis was likely to be more common in the DP arm than in the MVP arm (14% v 6%, P = .056). CONCLUSION: DP chemotherapy combined with concurrent TRT is an alternative to MVP chemotherapy for patients with LA-NSCLC.

DOI： 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.7577

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

BACKGROUND: Ground-glass opacity (GGO), which is closely related with bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC), is being detected more frequently. BAC is considered to be a relatively less aggressive tumor, and immediate resection at the time of detection might not be necessary. Therefore, when GGO is detected, a CT follow-up examination is often performed. If growth is detected during the follow-up CT examination, resection is usually considered. However, the possible treatment delay caused by the scheduling of a CT follow-up examination is an issue that must be clarified. Since the cancer might progress during the follow-up period, such follow-up periods might have a negative influence on the patient's prognosis. This study attempted to clarify whether CT follow-up causes treatment delay. METHODS: A total of 113 lung cancer patients with pure or mixed GGO findings who underwent a resection after a CT follow-up examination between 1999 and 2005 were retrospectively examined. The CT findings at the initial detection, the changes in the CT findings during the CT follow-up period, the histology, the pathological stage and the outcomes after resection were reviewed and evaluated. RESULTS: The CT finding at the time of the initial detection showed pure GGO in 63 patients and mixed GGO in 50 patients. Histology revealed that adenocarcinoma was found in all 113 patients; squamous cell carcinoma was not found in any of the patients. One-hundred twelve patients were diagnosed as having Stage IA, and a singe patient with visceral pleura invasion was diagnosed as having Stage IB. Complete resections were performed in all the patients. The median postoperative follow-up period was 45.0 months. No recurrences or deaths were observed during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: No treatment delays or negative influences on patient outcome resulted from the CT follow-up period. A future prospective study should be conducted to establish the optimal CT follow-up program.

DOI： 10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.11.013

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

A combination of S-1, a newly developed oral 5-fluorouracil derivative, and cisplatin is reported to show anti-tumour activity against advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because S-1 shows synergistic effects with radiation, we conducted a phase I study to evaluate the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs), recommended doses (RDs), and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of cisplatin and S-1 when combined with concurrent thoracic radiation (total dose of 60 Gy with 2 Gy per daily fraction) in patients with locally advanced NSCLC. Chemotherapy consisted of two 4-week cycles of cisplatin administered on days 1 and 8, and S-1 administered on days 1-14. S-1/cisplatin dosages (mg/m(2)/day) were escalated as follows: 60/30, 60/40, 70/40, 80/40 and 80/50. Twenty-two previously untreated patients were enrolled. The MTDs and RDs for S-1/cisplatin were 80/50 and 80/40, respectively. DLTs included febrile neutropaenia, thrombocytopaenia, bacterial pneumonia and delayed second cycle of chemotherapy. No patient experienced radiation pneumonitis>grade 2 and only one patient experienced grade 3 radiation oesophagitis. The overall response rate was 86.4% with a median survival time of 24.4 months. These results indicate that combination cisplatin-S-1 chemotherapy with concurrent thoracic radiation would be a feasible treatment option and a phase II study is currently under way.

DOI： 10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.10.019

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is considered to be a standard treatment in patients with relapsed or extensive-disease (ED) small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), the survival benefit remains modest. Relapsed or ED-SCLC patients were enrolled. Topotecan and amrubicin were administered on Days 1-5 and on Days 3-5, respectively. Nine patients received a total of 24 cycles. Since all three patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (grade 4 neutropenia lasting for more than 4 days, grade 3 febrile neutropenia, and grade 4 thrombocytopenia) at the third dose level (topotecan: 0.75 mg/m2, amrubicin 40 mg/m2), the maximum tolerated dose was determined to be this dose level. Objective response was observed in six patients (67%). The maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of amrubicin increased in a dose-dependent manner. Amrubicin did not influence the pharmacokinetics of topotecan. The Cmax and AUC of amrubicin were correlated with the duration of grade 4 neutropenia. The mean Cmax of topotecan on day 2 in responders (22.9+/-3.6) was significantly higher than that in non-responders (10.9+/-0.4). This phase I study showed the safety and activity of two-drug combination of amrubicin and topotecan in patients with relapsed or ED-SCLC.

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

OBJECTIVES: Several investigators have reported that operative mortality in the elderly is acceptable. However, their patients are potentially biased with regard to some factors such as performance status (PS) and comorbidity. In this study, we discuss surgical indications for the elderly and effects on perioperative mortality and prognosis. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study was carried out by reviewing the records of 1,114 patients who were referred for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer between January 1993 and December 2002. The patients were classified into younger (< or = 75 years of age) and elderly (> or = 76 years of age) groups. The histologic subtype, TNM stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS, and treatment were reviewed for members of each group, and the proportion of patients who underwent surgery was compared between the two groups. The surgical procedures, perioperative mortality, and prognosis of the two groups were also compared. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the histologic distribution with no difference in TNM staging between the two groups. Regarding treatment, 51.0% of those in the younger group and 36.1% of those in the elderly group underwent surgery. The proportion of elderly patients who underwent surgery was significantly lower than that of the younger patients, mainly due to worse PS and comorbidity in the elderly patients. The perioperative mortality rates for the younger and elderly groups were 0.9% and 4.1%, respectively, with no significant difference, and the overall survival was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: When compared to younger patients, fewer elderly patients underwent surgery because of worse PS and comorbidity. However, in elderly patients with good PS and no comorbidity, the rate of perioperative mortality and the prognosis were similar to those in the younger patients. Therefore, advanced age only is not a negative factor for surgery in elderly patients.

PubMed

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

We report an elderly advanced NSCLC patient effectively treated with vinorelbine on an outpatient basis in cooperation with his family doctor. A 79-year-old man was referred to our hospital for evaluation of a nodular shadow in his right lung. Chest CT scan showed a 2.0 cm tumor shadow in right S1, and small nodular shadows in right S4 and left S5. Neck lymph node biopsy yielded a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma. The clinical stage was IV, and he underwent chemotherapy of vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8. The regimen opted for a setup of a schedule, while the dose of vinorelbine and evaluation by CT were done in our hospital. This regimen was well tolerated and suitable. The patient could receive long-term continuation of the chemotherapy medication, and showed improvement in terms of prolongation of life and QOL.

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

The role of non-platinum combination chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not yet been clarified. In this phase I study, the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) and the antitumor activity of a two-drug combination of docetaxel (DCT) and irinotecan (CPT) in patients with advanced NSCLC were evaluated. Previously untreated patients with NSCLC in stage IIIB with malignant pleural effusion or stage IV were eligible. Both drugs were administered by 1-h intravenous infusion on day 1, and repeated every 3 weeks. DCT was given before CPT administration. Five escalating dose levels of DCT/CPT (40/135, 50/135, 50/150, 60/150, and 60/165 mg/m2) were studied. Eighteen patients received 44 courses. The DLT was considered to be neutropenia, because grade 4 neutropenia lasting for 3 days or more was observed in three patients, which was accompanied with three episodes of febrile neutropenia. As a non-hematological toxicity, grade 3 diarrhea occurred in three patients. Since all the three patients treated at the fifth dose level (DCT at 60 mg/m2 and CPT at 165 mg/m2) experienced DLT (grade 4 neutropenia in two patients and grade 3 hepatic toxicity in one), this dose level was determined to be the MTD. The objective response rate was 33.3%, and the median survival time was 13.6 months. To confirm the effectiveness of this combination for advanced NSCLC which was suggested in the present study, a phase II study with the recommended doses (150 mg/m2 for CPT and 50-60 mg/m2 for DCT) is warranted.

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to clarify the possibility of using pleural fluid levels of soluble IL-2 receptor (sIL-2R) and type III procollagen N-terminal aminopeptide (PIIIP) for differentiating tuberculous, carcinomatous and parapneumonic pleural effusions. METHODOLOGY: Fifty patients with pleural effusions were investigated retrospectively. The pleural effusions were due to tuberculosis (n = 11), carcinoma (n = 22), pneumonia (n = 9) and heart failure (n = 8). The concentrations of sIL-2R and PIIIP were measured in pleural effusion using commercially available kits. RESULTS: Soluble IL-2 receptor concentrations were highest in the patients with tuberculosis (6,856 +/- 3,212 U/mL), followed by those with carcinoma (4,680 +/- 1,872 U/mL), pneumonia (2,227 +/- 525 U/mL) and heart failure (1,439 +/- 244 U/mL). Significant differences were found between tuberculosis and carcinoma (P = 0.023), carcinoma and pneumonia (P = 0.015), and pneumonia and heart failure (P = 0.002) groups. Type III procollagen N-terminal aminopeptide concentrations were higher in the patients with tuberculosis (262.5 +/- 157.9 U/mL) and pneumonia (257.0 +/- 96.7 U/mL) than in those with carcinoma (48.0 +/- 27.7 U/mL) and heart failure (10.9 +/- 5.6 U/mL). Significant differences were found between tuberculosis and carcinoma (P < 0.001) and pneumonia and carcinoma (P < 0.001). To differentiate effusions, the cutoff points of sIL-2R (2,980 U/mL) and PIIIP (110.0 U/mL) were obtained from the highest concentration in the pneumonia group and in the carcinoma group, respectively. Using these criteria, the sensitivities for differentiating tuberculous, carcinomatous, and parapneumonic effusions were 90.9, 86.4 and 88.9%, respectively, with 100, 95 and 100% specificity, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The simultaneous determination of sIL-2R and PIIIP concentrations in pleural effusions may be clinically useful in differentiating tuberculous, carcinomatous, and parapneumonic effusions. Further assessments are required to determine the broad clinical application of this assay.

PubMed

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

The majority of patients with advanced lung cancer die within a few years. Accordingly, new therapeutic modalities need to be developed. Interleukin (IL)-12 was previously known as natural killer (NK) cell stimulatory factor or cytotoxic lymphocyte maturation factor. By virtue of its effects on T cells and NK cells, IL-12 seems to be one of the key cytokines that regulates cell-mediated anti tumor immune responses. Recently, there has been a substantial interest in the potential applications of IL-12 in the treatment of lung cancer. However, there have been no reports about the effect of IL-12 on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) obtained from lung cancer patients in an autologous setting. In this study, we examined the cytotoxicity of PBMC activated by IL-2, IL-12 or both against K562 or autologous lung cancer cells. In contrast to the effect of IL-2 on NK activity, IL-12 alone augmented NK activity against K562 cells, but not against autologous lung cancer cells. IL-12 augmented the IL-2 mediated cytotoxicity of PBMC against both K562 and autologous lung cancer cells. In the absence of IL-2, IL-12 alone cannot induce an autologous anti-tumor effect in vivo. In summary, our results clearly demonstrated that IL-12 can augment the cytolytic activity of PBMC against K562 and autologous lung cancer cells when combined with IL-2, although, IL-12 alone was unable to induce a marked increase in the cytotoxicity against autologous lung cancer cells. These results suggest that an administration of IL-12 in combination with IL-2 may be a useful therapeutic option for solid tumors.

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publisher：The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine  

We report a 62-year-old male with extensive disease small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) who was successfully treated with double high-dose chemotherapy supported by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (auto-PBSCT). This patient achieved a partial response with 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy. After the peripheral blood stem cell mobilization, two cycles of high-dose ICE regimen (ifosfamide 3, 000 mg/m² at days 1 to 5, carboplatin 400 mg/m² at days 1, 3, 5, and etoposide 500 mg/m² at days 1, 3, 5) could be given with further regression of the tumor and acceptable toxicities. This successful case suggests the feasibility of double high-dose ICE with auto-PBSCT in elderly patients with SCLC.<br>(Internal Medicine 38: 892-895, 1999)

DOI： 10.2169/internalmedicine.38.892

CiNii Books

researchmap

Other Link： https://jlc.jst.go.jp/DN/JALC/00086792035?from=CiNii

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

Problem: Overall survival has been substantially improved in limited disease small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC) with a combination of thoracic irradiation and systemic chemotherapy. However, late brain relapse, developing especially after prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI), is one of the major obstacles to achieving the further improvement. Methods: Sixty-nine patients with LD-SCLC who developed brain relapse were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the effect of salvage treatment on survival. Of those, 55 patients have received PCI. Results: A combined modality treatment consisting of low-dose cranial irradiation plus intra-arterial infusion of cisplatin resulted in better long-term survival for SCLC patients with brain relapse after PCI compared with cranial irradiation alone or best supportive care alone. A 42-year old patient receiving the CMT has continued a complete response for 10 years. Conclusions: A combined modality treatment consisting of low-dose cranial irradiation plus intra-arterial infusion of cisplatin is effective for treatment of brain relapse and warrants further study in SCLC patients developing brain metastasis after PCI. © 1999 OPA (Overseas Publishers Association) N.V. Published by license under the Harwood Academic Publishers imprint, part of the Gordon and Breach Publishing Group.

Scopus

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：一般社団法人 日本アレルギー学会  

DOI： 10.15036/arerugi.46.283_1

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：特定非営利活動法人 日本呼吸器内視鏡学会  

DOI： 10.18907/jjsre.19.3_264_1

researchmap

J-GLOBAL

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(有)科学評論社  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：English   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：English   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本呼吸器学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本呼吸器学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：国立病院総合医学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(株)メディカルレビュー社  

researchmap

Language：English   Publisher：日本がん免疫学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(有)科学評論社  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本呼吸器学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本呼吸器学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本呼吸器学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本呼吸器学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本呼吸器学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本内科学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本内科学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：日本がん免疫学会  

J-GLOBAL

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(株)診断と治療社  

＜Headline＞ 1 免疫チェックポイント阻害薬の登場で、ドライバーがん遺伝子を有さない非小細胞肺がん治療は大きく変わりつつある。2 PD-L1が高発現(PD-L1≧50%)のドライバーがん遺伝子を有さない非小細胞肺がんでは一次治療としてペムブロリズマブ単剤が推奨される。3 PD-L1発現率が1%未満、または不明なドライバーがん遺伝子を有さない非小細胞肺がんでは、二次治療でニボルマブが推奨される。4 二次治療以降において、適格症例では抗血管内皮増殖因子受容体-2(VEGFR-2)阻害薬であるラムシルマブと、ドセタキセルの併用療法が推奨される。(著者抄録)

researchmap

Other Link： https://search.jamas.or.jp/index.php?module=Default&action=Link&pub_year=2017&ichushi_jid=J00697&link_issn=&doc_id=20171120030011&doc_link_id=%2Fae4digta%2F2017%2F010511%2F013%2F1419-1425%26dl%3D0&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.medicalonline.jp%2Fjamas.php%3FGoodsID%3D%2Fae4digta%2F2017%2F010511%2F013%2F1419-1425%26dl%3D0&type=MedicalOnline&icon=https%3A%2F%2Fjk04.jamas.or.jp%2Ficon%2F00004_2.gif

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本癌治療学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本癌治療学会  

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：OXFORD UNIV PRESS  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本内科学会  

researchmap

Other Link： https://search.jamas.or.jp/index.php?module=Default&action=Link&pub_year=2017&ichushi_jid=J01159&link_issn=&doc_id=20170622100005&doc_link_id=10.2169%2Fnaika.106.1108&url=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.2169%2Fnaika.106.1108&type=J-STAGE&icon=https%3A%2F%2Fjk04.jamas.or.jp%2Ficon%2F00007_3.gif

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本呼吸器内視鏡学会  

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY  

DOI： 10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.e20614

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY  

DOI： 10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.8534

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本呼吸器学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(株)ヴァンメディカル  

＜View Points!＞一次治療としては、症例を慎重に選び副作用に十分注意しながら慎重にプラチナ製剤併用療法を考慮してもよいが、基本的には第三世代抗がん薬単剤を行うよう勧められる。二次治療としては、ドセタキセル、ペメトレキセド、S-1単剤療法のエビデンスが確立されており推奨されるが、その施行においては慎重な観察と支持療法が必要となる。PS2は多様な集団であり、化学療法を行う際には特に副作用の観察には細心の注意を払い、適切な支持療法、副作用の程度に応じた薬剤の減量、治療中止を含めた治療方針の変更など、柔軟な対応が求められる。(著者抄録)

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC  

DOI： 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.11.1237

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：OXFORD UNIV PRESS  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：国立病院総合医学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：国立病院総合医学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(有)科学評論社  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：OXFORD UNIV PRESS  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(有)科学評論社  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(株)メジカルビュー社  

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY  

DOI： 10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.9012

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本呼吸器学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：OXFORD UNIV PRESS  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：OXFORD UNIV PRESS  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：日本医療薬学会  

CiNii Books

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：ELSEVIER SCI LTD  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：ELSEVIER SCI LTD  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本癌治療学会  

researchmap

Language：English   Publisher：(一社)日本癌治療学会  

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本癌治療学会  

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：ELSEVIER SCI LTD  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(株)癌と化学療法社  

researchmap

Other Link： https://search.jamas.or.jp/index.php?module=Default&action=Link&pub_year=2015&ichushi_jid=J00296&link_issn=&doc_id=20150826190011&doc_link_id=%2Fab8gtkrc%2F2015%2F004208%2F012%2F0944-0951%26dl%3D0&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.medicalonline.jp%2Fjamas.php%3FGoodsID%3D%2Fab8gtkrc%2F2015%2F004208%2F012%2F0944-0951%26dl%3D0&type=MedicalOnline&icon=https%3A%2F%2Fjk04.jamas.or.jp%2Ficon%2F00004_2.gif

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本医師事務作業補助研究会  

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本呼吸器内視鏡学会  

researchmap

Other Link： https://search.jamas.or.jp/index.php?module=Default&action=Link&pub_year=2015&ichushi_jid=J00298&link_issn=&doc_id=20150521230309&doc_link_id=%2Fcf0brond%2F2015%2F0037s1%2F309%2F5252-5252%26dl%3D0&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.medicalonline.jp%2Fjamas.php%3FGoodsID%3D%2Fcf0brond%2F2015%2F0037s1%2F309%2F5252-5252%26dl%3D0&type=MedicalOnline&icon=https%3A%2F%2Fjk04.jamas.or.jp%2Ficon%2F00004_2.gif

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本呼吸器学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本呼吸器学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本呼吸器学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本呼吸器学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本内科学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本内科学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(株)ライフ・サイエンス  

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：OXFORD UNIV PRESS  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：English   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本医師事務作業補助研究会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(有)科学評論社  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(株)へるす出版  

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS  

DOI： 10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.7576

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY  

DOI： 10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.7504

Web of Science

researchmap

J-GLOBAL

researchmap

J-GLOBAL

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本癌治療学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本医療マネジメント学会  

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本呼吸器内視鏡学会  

researchmap

Other Link： https://search.jamas.or.jp/index.php?module=Default&action=Link&pub_year=2013&ichushi_jid=J00298&link_issn=&doc_id=20130415260052&doc_link_id=%2Fcf0brond%2F2013%2Fs03502%2F034%2F0229-0229%26dl%3D0&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.medicalonline.jp%2Fjamas.php%3FGoodsID%3D%2Fcf0brond%2F2013%2Fs03502%2F034%2F0229-0229%26dl%3D0&type=MedicalOnline&icon=https%3A%2F%2Fjk04.jamas.or.jp%2Ficon%2F00004_2.gif

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本呼吸器学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本呼吸器学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本呼吸器学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本呼吸器学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本内科学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本癌治療学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本癌治療学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本癌治療学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本癌治療学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：OXFORD UNIV PRESS  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：OXFORD UNIV PRESS  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本呼吸器内視鏡学会  

researchmap

Other Link： https://search.jamas.or.jp/index.php?module=Default&action=Link&pub_year=2012&ichushi_jid=J00298&link_issn=&doc_id=20120807300048&doc_link_id=%2Fcf0brond%2F2012%2Fs03404%2F031%2F0402-0402%26dl%3D0&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.medicalonline.jp%2Fjamas.php%3FGoodsID%3D%2Fcf0brond%2F2012%2Fs03404%2F031%2F0402-0402%26dl%3D0&type=MedicalOnline&icon=https%3A%2F%2Fjk04.jamas.or.jp%2Ficon%2F00004_2.gif

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本呼吸器学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本内科学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：国立病院総合医学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本癌治療学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本癌治療学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本呼吸器内視鏡学会  

researchmap

Other Link： https://search.jamas.or.jp/index.php?module=Default&action=Link&pub_year=2011&ichushi_jid=J00298&link_issn=&doc_id=20110621380056&doc_link_id=%2Fcf0brond%2F2011%2F003303%2F057%2F0205-0205%26dl%3D2&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.medicalonline.jp%2Fjamas.php%3FGoodsID%3D%2Fcf0brond%2F2011%2F003303%2F057%2F0205-0205%26dl%3D2&type=MedicalOnline&icon=https%3A%2F%2Fjk04.jamas.or.jp%2Ficon%2F00004_5.gif

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本呼吸器内視鏡学会  

researchmap

Other Link： https://search.jamas.or.jp/index.php?module=Default&action=Link&pub_year=2011&ichushi_jid=J00298&link_issn=&doc_id=20110621380027&doc_link_id=%2Fcf0brond%2F2011%2F003303%2F028%2F0199-0199%26dl%3D2&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.medicalonline.jp%2Fjamas.php%3FGoodsID%3D%2Fcf0brond%2F2011%2F003303%2F028%2F0199-0199%26dl%3D2&type=MedicalOnline&icon=https%3A%2F%2Fjk04.jamas.or.jp%2Ficon%2F00004_5.gif

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本呼吸器内視鏡学会  

researchmap

Other Link： https://search.jamas.or.jp/index.php?module=Default&action=Link&pub_year=2011&ichushi_jid=J00298&link_issn=&doc_id=20110615200187&doc_link_id=%2Fcf0brond%2F2011%2F0033s1%2F190%2F5220-5220%26dl%3D0&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.medicalonline.jp%2Fjamas.php%3FGoodsID%3D%2Fcf0brond%2F2011%2F0033s1%2F190%2F5220-5220%26dl%3D0&type=MedicalOnline&icon=https%3A%2F%2Fjk04.jamas.or.jp%2Ficon%2F00004_2.gif

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本呼吸器学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本呼吸器学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本呼吸器学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本癌治療学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本癌治療学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本呼吸器内視鏡学会  

researchmap

Other Link： https://search.jamas.or.jp/index.php?module=Default&action=Link&pub_year=2010&ichushi_jid=J00298&link_issn=&doc_id=20100621400072&doc_link_id=%2Fcf0brond%2F2010%2F0032s1%2F072%2F5120-5120%26dl%3D0&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.medicalonline.jp%2Fjamas.php%3FGoodsID%3D%2Fcf0brond%2F2010%2F0032s1%2F072%2F5120-5120%26dl%3D0&type=MedicalOnline&icon=https%3A%2F%2Fjk04.jamas.or.jp%2Ficon%2F00004_2.gif

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本呼吸器学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本呼吸器学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本呼吸器学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(株)癌と化学療法社  

当院の病理病期IB、II、IIIA期非小細胞癌・切除例に対する術後補助化学療法の現状および術後補助化学療法の臨床研究登録状況をまとめた。2001年8月〜2008年12月31日までに術後補助化学療法の候補患者数は315例であった。315例のうち186例(59%)に術後補助化学療法が行われた。術後補助化学療法を行った群は行わなかった群に対し有意に若く、併存疾患も少なかった。術後補助化学療法は経口剤であるUFTが大多数を占め、carboplatin+paclitaxel、gemcitabine、cisplatin+vinorelbineがそれに続いた。術後補助化学療法施行186例中、臨床研究登録例は25例(13%)と少数であった。臨床研究に登録しなかった理由として、20例で医療者サイドがregimenを選択し、残りの141例で患者サイドがregimenを自ら選択し希望していた。術後補助化学療法の臨床研究参加率は低く、多くは患者自身が治療法を選択していた。(著者抄録)

researchmap

Other Link： https://search.jamas.or.jp/index.php?module=Default&action=Link&pub_year=2010&ichushi_jid=J00296&link_issn=&doc_id=20100318480011&doc_link_id=%2Fab8gtkrc%2F2010%2F003703%2F012%2F0439-0442%26dl%3D0&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.medicalonline.jp%2Fjamas.php%3FGoodsID%3D%2Fab8gtkrc%2F2010%2F003703%2F012%2F0439-0442%26dl%3D0&type=MedicalOnline&icon=https%3A%2F%2Fjk04.jamas.or.jp%2Ficon%2F00004_2.gif

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(株)学研メディカル秀潤社  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(株)学研メディカル秀潤社  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本癌治療学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本癌治療学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本癌治療学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本癌治療学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本癌治療学会  

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本呼吸器内視鏡学会  

researchmap

Other Link： https://search.jamas.or.jp/index.php?module=Default&action=Link&pub_year=2009&ichushi_jid=J00298&link_issn=&doc_id=20090617290042&doc_link_id=%2Fcf0brond%2F2009%2F003103%2F046%2F0177-0177%26dl%3D2&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.medicalonline.jp%2Fjamas.php%3FGoodsID%3D%2Fcf0brond%2F2009%2F003103%2F046%2F0177-0177%26dl%3D2&type=MedicalOnline&icon=https%3A%2F%2Fjk04.jamas.or.jp%2Ficon%2F00004_5.gif

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本呼吸器内視鏡学会  

researchmap

Other Link： https://search.jamas.or.jp/index.php?module=Default&action=Link&pub_year=2009&ichushi_jid=J00298&link_issn=&doc_id=20090617290048&doc_link_id=%2Fcf0brond%2F2009%2F003103%2F052%2F0178-0179%26dl%3D2&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.medicalonline.jp%2Fjamas.php%3FGoodsID%3D%2Fcf0brond%2F2009%2F003103%2F052%2F0178-0179%26dl%3D2&type=MedicalOnline&icon=https%3A%2F%2Fjk04.jamas.or.jp%2Ficon%2F00004_5.gif

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (international conference)   Publisher：AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY  

Web of Science

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本クリニカルパス学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本癌治療学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Other Link： https://search.jamas.or.jp/index.php?module=Default&action=Link&pub_year=2008&ichushi_jid=J01244&link_issn=&doc_id=20081016270238&doc_link_id=%2Fec7jaluc%2F2008%2F004805%2F0ee%2F0464-0464%26dl%3D0&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.medicalonline.jp%2Fjamas.php%3FGoodsID%3D%2Fec7jaluc%2F2008%2F004805%2F0ee%2F0464-0464%26dl%3D0&type=MedicalOnline&icon=https%3A%2F%2Fjk04.jamas.or.jp%2Ficon%2F00004_2.gif

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Other Link： https://search.jamas.or.jp/index.php?module=Default&action=Link&pub_year=2008&ichushi_jid=J01244&link_issn=&doc_id=20081016270318&doc_link_id=%2Fec7jaluc%2F2008%2F004805%2F13e%2F0485-0485%26dl%3D0&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.medicalonline.jp%2Fjamas.php%3FGoodsID%3D%2Fec7jaluc%2F2008%2F004805%2F13e%2F0485-0485%26dl%3D0&type=MedicalOnline&icon=https%3A%2F%2Fjk04.jamas.or.jp%2Ficon%2F00004_2.gif

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本呼吸器内視鏡学会  

researchmap

Other Link： https://search.jamas.or.jp/index.php?module=Default&action=Link&pub_year=2008&ichushi_jid=J00298&link_issn=&doc_id=20080603300050&doc_link_id=%2Fcf0brond%2F2008%2F003003%2F052%2F0165-0165%26dl%3D2&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.medicalonline.jp%2Fjamas.php%3FGoodsID%3D%2Fcf0brond%2F2008%2F003003%2F052%2F0165-0165%26dl%3D2&type=MedicalOnline&icon=https%3A%2F%2Fjk04.jamas.or.jp%2Ficon%2F00004_5.gif

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本呼吸器学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本呼吸器学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Other Link： https://search.jamas.or.jp/index.php?module=Default&action=Link&pub_year=2007&ichushi_jid=J01244&link_issn=&doc_id=20071019290370&doc_link_id=%2Fec7jaluc%2F2007%2F004705%2F370%2F0538-0538%26dl%3D0&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.medicalonline.jp%2Fjamas.php%3FGoodsID%3D%2Fec7jaluc%2F2007%2F004705%2F370%2F0538-0538%26dl%3D0&type=MedicalOnline&icon=https%3A%2F%2Fjk04.jamas.or.jp%2Ficon%2F00004_2.gif

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Other Link： https://search.jamas.or.jp/index.php?module=Default&action=Link&pub_year=2007&ichushi_jid=J01244&link_issn=&doc_id=20071019290398&doc_link_id=%2Fec7jaluc%2F2007%2F004705%2F398%2F0545-0545%26dl%3D0&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.medicalonline.jp%2Fjamas.php%3FGoodsID%3D%2Fec7jaluc%2F2007%2F004705%2F398%2F0545-0545%26dl%3D0&type=MedicalOnline&icon=https%3A%2F%2Fjk04.jamas.or.jp%2Ficon%2F00004_2.gif

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Other Link： https://search.jamas.or.jp/index.php?module=Default&action=Link&pub_year=2007&ichushi_jid=J01244&link_issn=&doc_id=20071019290641&doc_link_id=%2Fec7jaluc%2F2007%2F004705%2F641%2F0605-0605%26dl%3D0&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.medicalonline.jp%2Fjamas.php%3FGoodsID%3D%2Fec7jaluc%2F2007%2F004705%2F641%2F0605-0605%26dl%3D0&type=MedicalOnline&icon=https%3A%2F%2Fjk04.jamas.or.jp%2Ficon%2F00004_2.gif

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Other Link： https://search.jamas.or.jp/index.php?module=Default&action=Link&pub_year=2007&ichushi_jid=J01244&link_issn=&doc_id=20071019290140&doc_link_id=%2Fec7jaluc%2F2007%2F004705%2F140%2F0479-0479%26dl%3D0&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.medicalonline.jp%2Fjamas.php%3FGoodsID%3D%2Fec7jaluc%2F2007%2F004705%2F140%2F0479-0479%26dl%3D0&type=MedicalOnline&icon=https%3A%2F%2Fjk04.jamas.or.jp%2Ficon%2F00004_2.gif

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本癌治療学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(NPO)日本肺癌学会